• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You reap what you sow

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Re: Analogy

    Beuatiful trolling Chico - keep up the good work. In terms of nuance, tone etc. it is inch perfect.:lol

    Comment


      Re: Analogy

      Nahh a good troll at least sounds intelligent and informed and is capable of giving plausible sounding arguments. Where as chico's are basically "because the bible says so" or "go to GCSE religious studies"

      Comment


        Re: Analogy

        NSW

        go to GCSE religious studies
        Where is this magical place?

        Chico in "annoy those pesky atheist and secular humanists" mode

        Comment


          Re: Analogy

          F$666 Inappropriate use of the sainted GOTO command.

          Comment


            Re: Oh dear

            Chico,

            You should try reading what people write
            I think a person called Jesus (or Joshua or Jeshu) did exist
            When it comes to the historical evidence for his existence, primary evidence is thin on the ground. Yes there are references to Jesus, but on closer inspection they are all secondary sources. Not to be ignored, certainly, but inevitably coloured by the authors opinion of the original subject. Josephus wrote in 94AD, some 60 years after the events, and based his passage on things that he had heard, not what he had experienced, Tacitus wrote in 112 AD, again repeating things that he had heard. Josephus is important , certainly, as he seems to be the ONLY non-biblical mention of Jesus in the first century and he wasn't born until 37 AD, after the event. Some scholars also believe that his account has been tampered with by later writers, to add details of the Resurrection.

            Comment

            Working...
            X