• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

FLCs - LFIG Proposal

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #71
    Originally posted by jamesbrown View Post
    Yeah, but who would a Labour gov't listen to?

    Useful letter anyway. I don't think it says much that we didn't know, i.e. it's a tough backdrop, but it's important to hear these concerns from people that know what they're talking about. The downside risks of IPSE lending credibility to the FLC structure remain, as do the upside benefits of influencing the design. One can argue the balance either way. My concern is more with the working assumption that it will be (can be) optional, because I think it clearly won't be optional.
    +1 opting out and opting in is supposedly optional but many agencies won't deal with people who want to opt in. If payments to an FLC are excluded from HMRC's agency requirements I can imagine most agencies will say use an FLC or forget about that contract...
    merely at clientco for the entertainment

    Comment


      #72
      Originally posted by eek View Post
      +1 opting out and opting in is supposedly optional but many agencies won't deal with people who want to opt in. If payments to an FLC are excluded from HMRC's agency requirements I can imagine most agencies will say use an FLC or forget about that contract...
      Yes - there's a difference between it being optional in legislation (which it will be) and optional in practice (which it won't be)

      It's perfectly simple - you keep a Ltd for the one place that accepts them, and an FLC for everything else...
      Best Forum Advisor 2014
      Work in the public sector? You can read my FAQ here
      Click here to get 15% off your first year's IPSE membership

      Comment


        #73
        Originally posted by eek View Post
        +1 opting out and opting in is supposedly optional but many agencies won't deal with people who want to opt in. If payments to an FLC are excluded from HMRC's agency requirements I can imagine most agencies will say use an FLC or forget about that contract...
        It's inevitable that scenario would play out, there's no debate that the Agencies would take the path of least resistance which is to ignore contractors who won't use the FLC approach.

        Optional or not is utterly irrelevant the Agencies ignore their toothless regulation bodies.

        Comment


          #74
          Originally posted by TheFaQQer View Post
          Yes - there's a difference between it being optional in legislation (which it will be) and optional in practice (which it won't be)

          It's perfectly simple - you keep a Ltd for the one place that accepts them, and an FLC for everything else...
          Nope I move up the food chain replace agents with salesmen and bring contractors in to pick up the stuff I can't offshore.
          merely at clientco for the entertainment

          Comment


            #75
            Originally posted by eek View Post
            Nope I move up the food chain replace agents with salesmen and bring contractors in to pick up the stuff I can't offshore.
            Make them work via an FLC though
            Best Forum Advisor 2014
            Work in the public sector? You can read my FAQ here
            Click here to get 15% off your first year's IPSE membership

            Comment

            Working...
            X