• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Just so I get it right

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    Originally posted by AtW View Post
    Pro-business Tory Scum are fooking over contractors far and beyond what anti-business New Liebor ever did or ever hoped to achieve?
    They're pro-business not pro-expensive-temp.
    Originally posted by MaryPoppins
    I'd still not breastfeed a nazi
    Originally posted by vetran
    Urine is quite nourishing

    Comment


      #12
      Originally posted by d000hg View Post
      They're pro-business not pro-expensive-temp.
      If enforcing IR35 in a new way has dealt with the issue of using Ltds as PSC, then why did they increase dividends tax by 25%???

      Comment


        #13
        Originally posted by AtW View Post
        If enforcing IR35 in a new way has dealt with the issue of using Ltds as PSC, then why did they increase dividends tax by 25%???
        To stop fat-cat (or fat-squirrel) directors earning millions and getting big tax-cuts compared to their workers
        Originally posted by MaryPoppins
        I'd still not breastfeed a nazi
        Originally posted by vetran
        Urine is quite nourishing

        Comment


          #14
          Originally posted by d000hg View Post
          To stop fat-cat (or fat-squirrel) directors earning millions and getting big tax-cuts compared to their workers
          So that's supposed to be pro-business?

          What this got to do with directors anyway, tax is on business owners
          Last edited by AtW; 23 January 2017, 23:31.

          Comment


            #15
            Originally posted by AtW View Post
            So that's supposed to be pro-business?
            The really rich take their winnings offshore dhaling
            http://www.cih.org/news-article/disp...housing_market

            Comment


              #16
              Originally posted by PurpleGorilla View Post
              The really rich take their winnings offshore dhaling
              Yup, offshore trust or Ltd owning UK Ltd shares won't pay a dime on tax - so this extra tax is on honest mugs who live in UK and choose to play honestly

              Comment


                #17
                Originally posted by AtW View Post
                So that's supposed to be pro-business?

                What this got to do with directors anyway, tax is on business owners
                Pro business doesn't have to mean lucrative tax breaks for the rich. That's the Labour view of a Tory government, that all they do is help the rich. Are your socialist roots showing again?
                Originally posted by MaryPoppins
                I'd still not breastfeed a nazi
                Originally posted by vetran
                Urine is quite nourishing

                Comment


                  #18
                  Originally posted by d000hg View Post
                  Pro business doesn't have to mean lucrative tax breaks for the rich. That's the Labour view of a Tory government, that all they do is help the rich. Are your socialist roots showing again?
                  What tax breaks??? If company is paying corp tax that should be recognized in the dividends tax, which is levied on same money. It's double taxation in the first place, at least taking paid into account would be fair option - pound for pound paid at least.

                  Cons failed to drop tax back to 40% that th ey said was right level, instead they increased fivudeends tax so thst it became at worse level than under 50% Liebir.

                  The rich pay dividends to offshore holding companies, they are not affected.

                  This betrayal will cost Tory Scum
                  Last edited by AtW; 24 January 2017, 11:24.

                  Comment


                    #19
                    Originally posted by AtW View Post
                    What tax breaks???
                    If you weren't aware of them then you haven't lost out

                    Spouting terms like "double taxation" is misleading. If I tax you 10%, then 10% again on what's left that's double taxation. But that's better than being taxed once at 20%... so the fact it's double taxation alone is meaningless.

                    Get on with your coding and hire someone to manage the business side of things for you. Or wait until Theresa's race to the bottom.
                    Originally posted by MaryPoppins
                    I'd still not breastfeed a nazi
                    Originally posted by vetran
                    Urine is quite nourishing

                    Comment


                      #20
                      Originally posted by AtW View Post
                      What tax breaks??? If company is paying corp tax that should be recognized in the dividends tax, which is levied on same money. It's double taxation in the first place, at least taking paid into account would be fair option - pound for pound paid at least.

                      Cons failed to drop tax back to 40% that th ey said was right level, instead they increased fivudeends tax so thst it became at worse level than under 50% Liebir.

                      The rich pay dividends to offshore holding companies, they are not affected.

                      This betrayal will cost Tory Scum
                      Time to leave the UK and become resident of the Isle of Man I think.
                      "You’re just a bad memory who doesn’t know when to go away" JR

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X