Originally posted by northernladyuk
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Austria to ban full-face veil in public places
Collapse
X
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by LondonManc View Post... just like orange faces and white high heels is Essex's normal.
Originally posted by sal View Postwhat about MGM a.k.a. circumcision? yay or nayDown with racism. Long live miscegenation!Comment
-
Originally posted by northernladyuk View PostSo people who choose to dress in a way that is in opposition to mainstream cultural sensitivities should have their right to do so protected by law?Comment
-
Originally posted by NotAllThere View PostNo that's just you.
Male circumcision does not have the same tendency to cause severe medical problems, nor does it remove or reduce sexual pleasure. If circumcision were like FGM, it would be removing the entire glans - not just a bit of skin. It really isn't in the same ...er... ball park.Comment
-
Originally posted by The_Equalizer View PostHow on earth has FGM become such a problem in the UK?Comment
-
Originally posted by The_Equalizer View PostHow on earth has FGM become such a problem in the UK?The greatest trick the devil ever pulled was convincing the world that he didn't existComment
-
Originally posted by woohoo View Post******* backward religions.Comment
-
Originally posted by The_Equalizer View PostAnd the government of the time didn't have the will/ba77s to do anything to stop it.The greatest trick the devil ever pulled was convincing the world that he didn't existComment
-
Originally posted by woohoo View PostNo it's nothing to do with opposition to mainstream cultural sensitivities. It's about the rights of an individual. If an individual is forced to wear full dress for example by a religion then that practice should outlawed.Comment
-
Originally posted by The_Equalizer View PostAnd the government of the time didn't have the will/ba77s to do anything to stop it.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Streamline Your Retirement with iSIPP: A Solution for Contractor Pensions Sep 1 09:13
- Making the most of pension lump sums: overview for contractors Sep 1 08:36
- Umbrella company tribunal cases are opening up; are your wages subject to unlawful deductions, too? Aug 31 08:38
- Contractors, relabelling 'labour' as 'services' to appear 'fully contracted out' won't dupe IR35 inspectors Aug 31 08:30
- How often does HMRC check tax returns? Aug 30 08:27
- Work-life balance as an IT contractor: 5 top tips from a tech recruiter Aug 30 08:20
- Autumn Statement 2023 tipped to prioritise mental health, in a boost for UK workplaces Aug 29 08:33
- Final reminder for contractors to respond to the umbrella consultation (closing today) Aug 29 08:09
- Top 5 most in demand cyber security contract roles Aug 25 08:38
- Changes to the right to request flexible working are incoming, but how will contractors be affected? Aug 24 08:25
Comment