• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Should the EU be making progressive scientific constructions like this?

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    Indeed, how likely is the UK to compete in the future for projects like this to be built on the little island? If you're in the customs union you've access to many many suppliers without red tape when crossing borders.
    "Never argue with stupid people, they will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience". Mark Twain

    Comment


      #12
      Originally posted by milanbenes View Post
      Bob,

      you have a point, but the difference between using the money to build houses and using the money to experiment with the goal of finding this new form of cheap electricity is....

      Building a house just houses that family

      Do the experimental project for 50 years will employee the father who feeds the family and buys the house

      Therefore the investment in the Experimental Thingy is better for the economy

      Milan.
      How many workers would it take to erect/modify the houses and the solar panels? Im guessing the kinds number of people that can work on nuclear fusion reactors are fairly small compared to the thousands of bread winners that can build a wall or re-roof a building.

      In an ideal world we should do both but seeing as there is already a sun there to provide the free energy today spending billions to re-create one is a little pointless.

      Comment


        #13
        Originally posted by milanbenes View Post
        Bob,

        you have a point, but the difference between using the money to build houses and using the money to experiment with the goal of finding this new form of cheap electricity is....

        Building a house just houses that family

        Do the experimental project for 50 years will employee the father who feeds the family and buys the house

        Therefore the investment in the Experimental Thingy is better for the economy

        Milan.
        There are probably only a thousand people in the world who would work on this sort of project, there are millions of builders.
        Always forgive your enemies; nothing annoys them so much.

        Comment


          #14
          Originally posted by scooterscot View Post
          Indeed, how likely is the UK to compete in the future for projects like this to be built on the little island? If you're in the customs union you've access to many many suppliers without red tape when crossing borders.
          Why not. Japan, Korea, and Russia all have smaller economies than the UK.

          http://fusionforenergy.europa.eu/und...er_parties.jpg

          Isn't CERN outside the European Union.

          Saudi Arabia are about to build a cyclotron.

          We are a global leader in wind technology. Long may it blow.
          http://www.cih.org/news-article/disp...housing_market

          Comment


            #15
            Originally posted by PurpleGorilla View Post

            We are a global leader in wind technology. Long may it blow.
            and there is so much hot air here!
            Always forgive your enemies; nothing annoys them so much.

            Comment


              #16
              Originally posted by vetran View Post
              and there is so much hot air here!
              [emoji8]
              http://www.cih.org/news-article/disp...housing_market

              Comment


                #17
                Or this?

                https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gu%C3%A9delon_Castle

                Comment


                  #18
                  its excellent I note the Beeb sent their historians over and made some great telly there

                  BBC Two - Secrets of the Castle with Ruth, Peter and Tom

                  but we got there first (after Kon Tiki)

                  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Butser_Ancient_Farm

                  The Roundhouse Project

                  and

                  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Experimental_archaeology
                  Last edited by vetran; 16 May 2017, 15:53.
                  Always forgive your enemies; nothing annoys them so much.

                  Comment


                    #19
                    Originally posted by milanbenes View Post
                    the "Project" has a 20 years timeline just to get to the point where they switch on the machine !!
                    I did the maths of this in final year at university. And then there were building a machine that would take 20 years to switch on.

                    I have more faith in the church than that load of charlatans. I f**king hate the church....

                    Comment


                      #20
                      Impressive, but I like this clock better :-)
                      You're awesome! Get yourself a t-shirt.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X