PM FAO AtW PM FAO AtW - Page 4
Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst ... 234
Posts 31 to 34 of 34

Thread: PM FAO AtW

  1. #31

    My post count is Majestic

    AtW is a fount of knowledge

    AtW's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    51,446

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by shaunbhoy View Post
    So you seem to effectively be saying that there is no difference between Tax Avoidance and Tax Evasion. Who are you.....Gordon Brown?
    What they did is much closer to Tax Evasion than Tax Avoidance, in my opinion.

    Tax Avoidance would have been if they moved to Isle of Man and sold services of their own company whilst living in Isle of Man, now that would be honest, moral bona fide Tax Avoidance.
    Last edited by AtW; 5th July 2017 at 19:16.

  2. #32

    Banned

    Fronttoback 's job has never been outsourced


    Join Date
    Sep 2016
    Posts
    446

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BrilloPad View Post
    I wish to say sorry to AtW for my comments on this and the other thread. I will post no more.
    Post your apology here: http://forums.contractoruk.com/gener...it-thread.html

  3. #33

    Banned

    Fronttoback 's job has never been outsourced


    Join Date
    Sep 2016
    Posts
    446

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by AtW View Post
    It's terrible.

    But what's worse is to have hippocritical bunch who insist that it's all about legality rather than morality, then (after many years of legal proceedings) losing in court and taking a view that HMRC is immortal entity.

    You choose morality and "tax avoiders" lose straight away.

    Choose law and it happens many years down the line.

    Same result though (usually).
    Yeah, that's good. Really incisive. Why not post it here: http://forums.contractoruk.com/gener...it-thread.html

  4. #34

    Super poster

    centurian has more data than eek


    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    2,837

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by administrator View Post
    But when you are told by a scheme promoter that it is all above board, backed by a QC etc etc, how many of them still thought it was dodgy?
    I still thought it was dodgy - largely because they were telling me it was above board etc.

    Usually when someone has the need to tell you that something is above board - it probably isn't.

    If it was above board, they wouldn't need to tell me that.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •