Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Funny the worst racism I have seen in this country, and I have been around a lot in different communities, was within the Indian outsourcers both caste on caste amongst themselves and anti white British people. Funny I never see this called out for what it is in the mainstream media.
Funny the worst racism I have seen in this country, and I have been around a lot in different communities, was within the Indian outsourcers both caste on caste amongst themselves and anti white British people. Funny I never see this called out for what it is in the mainstream media.
It won't be.
Everyone I know who was brought up fully or partly in London has seen it.
"You’re just a bad memory who doesn’t know when to go away" JR
Funny the worst racism I have seen in this country, and I have been around a lot in different communities, was within the Indian outsourcers both caste on caste amongst themselves and anti white British people. Funny I never see this called out for what it is in the mainstream media.
TBH I'm surprised it's not worse given how we bled their country dry over 2 centuries.
TBH I'm surprised it's not worse given how we bled their country dry over 2 centuries.
Bollocks. We rescued them from their complete subjugation by the muslim Mughals, who for a good two or three hundred years had controlled the whole of what is now India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan.
Bollocks. We rescued them from their complete subjugation by the muslim Mughals, who for a good two or three hundred years had controlled the whole of what is now India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan.
Did you even read your own link, you ignoramus? Your knowledge of history is even worse than your maths ability, if that's possible.
"The Mughal Empire began a period of proto-industrialization,[19] and Mughal India became the world's largest economic power, with 24.4% of world GDP,[20] and the world leader in manufacturing,[21] producing 25% of global industrial output up until the 18th century.[22] The Mughal Empire is considered "India's last golden age"[23]"
The Mughal Empire did not try to intervene in the local societies during most of its existence, but rather balanced and pacified them through new administrative practices[26][27] and diverse and inclusive ruling elites,[28] leading to more systematic, centralised, and uniform rule.[29] Traditional and newly coherent social groups in northern and western India, such as the Marathas, the Rajputs, the Pashtuns, the Hindu Jats and the Sikhs, gained military and governing ambitions during Mughal rule, which, through collaboration or adversity, gave them both recognition and military experience.[30][31][32][33]
The Muslims of that period had not quite lost the dregs of the advanced civilisation they possessed in early centuries.
Did you even read your own link, you ignoramus? Your knowledge of history is even worse than your maths ability, if that's possible.
"The Mughal Empire began a period of proto-industrialization,[19] and Mughal India became the world's largest economic power, with 24.4% of world GDP,[20] and the world leader in manufacturing,[21] producing 25% of global industrial output up until the 18th century.[22] The Mughal Empire is considered "India's last golden age"[23]"
The Mughal Empire did not try to intervene in the local societies during most of its existence, but rather balanced and pacified them through new administrative practices[26][27] and diverse and inclusive ruling elites,[28] leading to more systematic, centralised, and uniform rule.[29] Traditional and newly coherent social groups in northern and western India, such as the Marathas, the Rajputs, the Pashtuns, the Hindu Jats and the Sikhs, gained military and governing ambitions during Mughal rule, which, through collaboration or adversity, gave them both recognition and military experience.[30][31][32][33]
The Muslims of that period had not quite lost the dregs of the advanced civilisation they possessed in early centuries.
Believe what you want, Sas, but I doubt if many non-Muslim Indians (or probably muslims ones for that matter) would agree.
The Mughals effectively ruled India for about 150 years during the 16th and 17th centuries, a period roughly comparable with that of the British Raj. On the whole, comparisons favour the latter. The British bequeathed India an impressive network of communications, a legal system and viable administration, a tradition of democratic government that has survived, battered but unbroken.
When Mughal power dwindled, the subcontinent degenerated into a patchwork of warring fiefs, a chaos that offered easy pickings for predatory European imperialists. The Taj Mahal, Shah Jahan's great masterpiece, may compare favourably with Edwin Lutyens's palace in New Delhi, but after the death of Aurangzeb many of the Mughal monuments crumbled; it took an English viceroy to rescue some of them from dereliction.
The Mughals failed because they made little, if any, effort to drag India out of the Middle Ages. ...
Also, notice how I used a "quote" box rather than just copying and pasting straight into my post.
That is something you should learn as well, so readers can separate the quoted part(s) from your ramblings
Comment