Jordan Peterson vs Cathy Newman

**Antman** · 18 January 2018, 19:55

She didn't show herself in the best light.

**woohoo** · 18 January 2018, 20:19

she did project a little bit, so kinda of twisted things around. Not sure how prepared she was for this interview. The other thing that annoyed me was that they started talking about his advice for young men, but she made it all about women and the context moved away from men. Which was disappointing.

First I've seen of this guy and I don't know his views/opinions but he does choose his words well and is very specific.

**darmstadt** · 18 January 2018, 20:32

Does sound a bit like a nutter though:

Life is suffering.
Love is the desire to see unnecessary suffering ameliorated.
Truth is the handmaiden of love.
Dialogue is the pathway to truth.
Humility is recognition of personal insufficiency and the willingness to learn.
To learn is to die voluntarily and be born again, in great ways and small.
So speech must be untrammeled, so that dialogue can take place.
So that we can all humbly learn.
So that truth can serve love.
So that suffering can be ameliorated.
So that we can all stumble forward to the Kingdom of God.

**woohoo** · 18 January 2018, 20:33

Originally posted by darmstadt View Post

Does sound a bit like a nutter though:

That does sound a bit nuttery.

**scooterscot** · 18 January 2018, 21:19

I hate to be a journalist. It was no easy interview and the comments thus far seem to support his 'men should grow up' argument.

**woohoo** · 18 January 2018, 21:28

Originally posted by scooterscot View Post

I hate to be a journalist. It was no easy interview and the comments thus far seem to support his 'men should grow up' argument.

which comments, you big fat, four eyed specy scootish hag baggis?

**CoolCat** · 19 January 2018, 08:26

Jordan is great. He has not got everything correct, but he is a lot closer than the main stream media and political elites of the developed world. In that interview you see someone who has read all the research on the relevant areas, who understands the true science, against someone who is just parroting the usual psuedo science drivel and fashions of an arty liberal elite.

Its unusual that full interviews are shown like this, the liberal elite normally edit them to try and show Jordan in a bad light and out of context.

And on the particulars of this specific issue he is completely correct for many more reasons than he had time to list, as I have seen with my own eyes repeatedly.

**Jog On** · 19 January 2018, 10:05

Listening now - she keeps putting words into his mouth to try and shame him and he's not having any of it

Her - "So what you're saying is _____"
Him - "No what I said was _____"

This is how these types of discussions should go. The whole tactic of labeling and shaming anyone who disagrees with an argument needs to go now.

**woohoo** · 19 January 2018, 10:42

Originally posted by Jog On View Post

Listening now - she keeps putting words into his mouth to try and shame him and he's not having any of it

Her - "So what you're saying is _____"
Him - "No what I said was _____"

This is how these types of discussions should go. The whole tactic of labeling and shaming anyone who disagrees with an argument needs to go now.

I've seen her interview Milos whats his name and it was pretty similar. But she had a couple of other women to help shout him down about the pay gap. By the way not a fan of Milos, he makes some good points then comes out with outrageous crap to increase his profile.

We need articulate men to talk about these issues that are not nutter or self serving. I don't know much about this prof guy so can't say if he is self serving or not.

Jordan Peterson vs Cathy Newman