Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
I have it on good authoridy that the condemned are drugged up to the eyeballs and have a considerable quantidy of blood medically drained prior to the execution such that they don't really know what's going on when they get to Chop Chop Square.
Not that it makes it OK (I'm anni capidal punishment) but is the Saudi method less humane than methods used in some American states? I think not.
And?! So was the Yorkshire Ripper and every serial killer who ever lived!
.. completely unneccesary act of violence by the policewoman, he didn't hurt anyone, just scared them a little.
Yes and perhaps next time if thwarted he would have whipped out a knife or gun and murdered someone.
Anyone who robs a person in the street, or wherever, should be aware they risk a reaction like that! So even if on the face of it the result was harsh, it was the thief's hard luck and a good outcome for deterrence
He was someones son, completely unneccesary act of violence by the policewoman, he didn't hurt anyone, just scared them a little.
You don't seem to understand. Shoot to kill first, ask questions later. The only DM solution to violence is violence. The only DM solution to anything is to bring back the blackshirts. The sooner everyone is murdered who disagrees with the DM, the sooner we will have world peace.
And?! So was the Yorkshire Ripper and every serial killer who ever lived!
Yes and perhaps next time if thwarted he would have whipped out a knife or gun and murdered someone.
Anyone who robs a person in the street, or wherever, should be aware they risk a reaction like that! So even if on the face of it the result was harsh, it was the thief's hard luck and a good outcome for deterrence
You don't seem to understand. Shoot to kill first, ask questions later. The only DM solution to violence is violence. The only DM solution to anything is to bring back the blackshirts. The sooner everyone is murdered who disagrees with the DM, the sooner we will have world peace.
But violence was not the answer. She was trained in negotiation, she could have talked him out of it before taking his sacred life.
Why not try giving him a hug, or offering a camomile tea this would have instantly defused the situation, or finally as Nat taught me last week on his inclusion course, ban him if he's Scottish and you don't agree with him.
But violence was not the answer. She was trained in negotiation, she could have talked him out of it before taking his sacred life.
Why not try giving him a hug, or offering a camomile tea this would have instantly defused the situation, or finally as Nat taught me last week on his inclusion course, ban him if he's Scottish and you don't agree with him.
Or batter him into submission with junk grade irony.
Comment