• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Baby Inflatable Trump

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    It gets the gammonflakes going, though.

    https://amp.theguardian.com/commenti...e-right-london

    Comment


      #12
      Originally posted by meridian View Post
      It gets the gammonflakes going, though.

      https://amp.theguardian.com/commenti...e-right-london
      Are these the same gammonflakes who whine about political correctness preventing freedom of speech and the brave political prisoner Tommy Robinson?

      Comment


        #13
        Originally posted by Old Greg View Post
        This isn't a protest by the Mayor of London. Do you realise that? Permission is being given for a protest by other parties. The alternative is to ban it, and that would devalue the mayor's office.
        Your having a laugh. There is permission to protest. But everytime there is a protest or head of state visit there is now a precedence to allow a huge flying inflatable that is disrespectful ? Would the Mayor have allowed the Chinese president in a nappy being floated around London on his visit? Or Merkel? Its a strange decision.

        Comment


          #14
          Originally posted by saptastic View Post
          Your having a laugh. There is permission to protest. But everytime there is a protest or head of state visit there is now a precedence to allow a huge flying inflatable that is disrespectful ? Would the Mayor have allowed the Chinese president in a nappy being floated around London on his visit? Or Merkel? Its a strange decision.
          Or the Saudi crown prince...
          "Is someone you don't like allowed to say something you don't like? If that is the case then we have free speech."- Elon Musk

          Comment


            #15
            Deja vu ...


            Trump-like chicken at White House ruffles feathers on Twitter


            Trump has a growing army of inflatable protesters. It's not obscene it's obese.

            I bet Trump loves it really. It's all about him.

            Now if the baby Trump was a barrage balloon intending to affect Air Force One ...
            Maybe tomorrow, I'll want to settle down. Until tomorrow, I'll just keep moving on.

            Comment


              #16
              Originally posted by Jog On View Post
              Or the Saudi crown prince...
              There should be a 100 ft blimp of him beheading a woman while ******* a pig.

              Comment


                #17
                Originally posted by saptastic View Post
                Your having a laugh. There is permission to protest. But everytime there is a protest or head of state visit there is now a precedence to allow a huge flying inflatable that is disrespectful ? Would the Mayor have allowed the Chinese president in a nappy being floated around London on his visit? Or Merkel? Its a strange decision.
                Take the Chinese premier for example. Why, in a free country, should it be impermissible to mock a tyrant? Who cares if it's disrespectful?

                Comment


                  #18
                  Perhaps it's a daft idea because tact and diplomancy usually work better than insults?

                  Comment


                    #19
                    Originally posted by Old Greg View Post
                    There should be a 100 ft blimp of him beheading a woman while ******* a pig.
                    That would be objectively obscene and grossly offensive, to most of the general public.

                    Not surprised you have suggested it though.
                    Originally posted by Old Greg
                    I admit I'm just a lazy, lying cretinous hypocrite and must be going deaf
                    ♕Keep calm & carry on♕

                    Comment


                      #20
                      Originally posted by Bean View Post
                      That would be objectively obscene and grossly offensive, to most of the general public.

                      Not surprised you have suggested it though.
                      Not as grossly offensive as beheading people.

                      Not surprised you have nothing to say about that though.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X