Originally posted by The_Equalizer
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Baby Inflatable Trump
Collapse
X
-
-
Originally posted by Old Greg View PostNot as grossly offensive as beheading people.
Not surprised you have nothing to say about that though.
We're talking about protests, with the one suggested by you being grossly offensive and obscene.
I have in the past, but can't remember if it was on here or not.
So, why do you think small children should see images of bestiality and execution?
(Since that would be a by-product of your suggested protest blimp)Originally posted by Old GregI admit I'm just a lazy, lying cretinous hypocrite and must be going deaf♕Keep calm & carry on♕Comment
-
Originally posted by saptastic View PostJust don't think the London mayor should disrespect a visiting head of state in 'childish' manner. He should 'rise above it'.
It devalues the mayors office.
Is it a security threat?
Is it likely to lead to riots/violence (apart from gammonflakes)
Would your opinion be different if the mayor in question was not Labour?
Would your opinion be different based on the mayor's religion?
Would your opinion be different if the person was not a US Republican?
Just asking.…Maybe we ain’t that young anymoreComment
-
Originally posted by d000hg View PostI think it's childish and not in great taste but as said, that's not a reason to ban it. Allowing things we violently disagree with is an important principle as long as it's not harmful.
When it involves political leaders and use of 'official areas' lie Parliament Square (if I have this right) more care is needed but the mayor allowing it is not the same as agreeing with it. I'm not sure why it got as far as the mayor anyway?
Of course if a rival group wants a Boris or Sadiq inflatable this should be allowed too - but I think British people are quite good at accepting this kind of thing in good humour.His heart is in the right place - shame we can't say the same about his brain...Comment
-
Originally posted by Bean View PostOf course not, but that's not what we're talking about.
We're talking about protests, with the one suggested by you being grossly offensive and obscene.
I have in the past, but can't remember if it was on here or not.
So, why do you think small children should see images of bestiality and execution?
(Since that would be a by-product of your suggested protest blimp)Comment
-
Originally posted by Old Greg View PostYou're not the most astute, are you?Originally posted by Old GregI admit I'm just a lazy, lying cretinous hypocrite and must be going deaf♕Keep calm & carry on♕Comment
-
Originally posted by Bean View PostDoes that question mean your virtue signalling is over?Comment
-
Originally posted by Old Greg View PostI reject the premise of that question.Originally posted by Old GregI admit I'm just a lazy, lying cretinous hypocrite and must be going deaf♕Keep calm & carry on♕Comment
-
Originally posted by WTFH View PostOn what legal grounds should he not have approved it?
Is it a security threat?
Is it likely to lead to riots/violence (apart from gammonflakes)
Would your opinion be different if the mayor in question was not Labour? No
Would your opinion be different based on the mayor's religion? No
Would your opinion be different if the person was not a US Republican? No
Just asking.
No legal grounds just like I say IMO petty.Comment
-
Originally posted by saptastic View PostAnswers as above. Lets not infer my political thoughts from my non approval of a baby inflatable !
No legal grounds just like I say IMO petty.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Streamline Your Retirement with iSIPP: A Solution for Contractor Pensions Sep 1 09:13
- Making the most of pension lump sums: overview for contractors Sep 1 08:36
- Umbrella company tribunal cases are opening up; are your wages subject to unlawful deductions, too? Aug 31 08:38
- Contractors, relabelling 'labour' as 'services' to appear 'fully contracted out' won't dupe IR35 inspectors Aug 31 08:30
- How often does HMRC check tax returns? Aug 30 08:27
- Work-life balance as an IT contractor: 5 top tips from a tech recruiter Aug 30 08:20
- Autumn Statement 2023 tipped to prioritise mental health, in a boost for UK workplaces Aug 29 08:33
- Final reminder for contractors to respond to the umbrella consultation (closing today) Aug 29 08:09
- Top 5 most in demand cyber security contract roles Aug 25 08:38
- Changes to the right to request flexible working are incoming, but how will contractors be affected? Aug 24 08:25
Comment