Originally posted by northernladuk
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
24 month rule and work place
Collapse
X
-
-
Ask Client to pay your accommodation for you directly and reduce your weekly invoice by that amountComment
-
Originally posted by TwoWolves View PostDidn't say you should, just pointed out that it's probably not the biggest risk a contractor needs to be worrying about.Comment
-
Originally posted by TheCyclingProgrammer View PostThere is no hard and fast rule. The general guidance is that for it to be considered a "new" workplace, there should be a significant change to the journey time and/or cost. Distance is not the only indicator (see the classic "bridge" example where a worker needs to work at the other end of a bridge - relatively close but involving a more costly and lengthy journey).Comment
-
Originally posted by Batcher View PostIt's also the general direction of travel that is taken into account along with the square mile rule.Blog? What blog...?Comment
-
Originally posted by malvolio View PostFor London generally, I've seen it expressed as travel to the nearest mainline railway station to determine the journey.Comment
-
Originally posted by GhostofTarbera View PostAsk Client to pay your accommodation for you directly and reduce your weekly invoice by that amountComment
-
Originally posted by LuckyLen View PostThank you. I will try to see if the Client will pay directly for the accommodation as this is the most significant cost. I will take a 'hit' on the travel cost if I can get them to agree to this.
And just as a cautionary note, the usual response is along the lines of "You quoted us a rate for the job, so it's your risk if your expenses have gone up". Think about how you would counter that argument.Blog? What blog...?Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Streamline Your Retirement with iSIPP: A Solution for Contractor Pensions Sep 1 09:13
- Making the most of pension lump sums: overview for contractors Sep 1 08:36
- Umbrella company tribunal cases are opening up; are your wages subject to unlawful deductions, too? Aug 31 08:38
- Contractors, relabelling 'labour' as 'services' to appear 'fully contracted out' won't dupe IR35 inspectors Aug 31 08:30
- How often does HMRC check tax returns? Aug 30 08:27
- Work-life balance as an IT contractor: 5 top tips from a tech recruiter Aug 30 08:20
- Autumn Statement 2023 tipped to prioritise mental health, in a boost for UK workplaces Aug 29 08:33
- Final reminder for contractors to respond to the umbrella consultation (closing today) Aug 29 08:09
- Top 5 most in demand cyber security contract roles Aug 25 08:38
- Changes to the right to request flexible working are incoming, but how will contractors be affected? Aug 24 08:25
Comment