Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Someone needs to stick up for them - they're getting blamed for everything at the moment..
You're sticking up for white male rapists? Not necessarily Kavanaugh of course, that's just an allegation. But rapists in general, you're sticking up for them?
Mor On is basically a small time financial markets parasite who is perversely pro Putin, pro Trump, pro Korbyn - easy target for brainwashing by the likes of ZH/RT
Would any firm in the world hire Kavanaugh if he had those women making such claims? No fooking way, and here he is being interview for the job from which he can't be fired for live, most important job in the court system too, pretty crazy that he is still being considered, this only shows the truth side of the Republican Party
You're sticking up for white male rapists? Not necessarily Kavanaugh of course, that's just an allegation. But rapists in general, you're sticking up for them?
Nice.
Someone has to - and that's 'CIS gender straight white male rapists' BTW - some white males are less equal than others you know (I expect you already know that).
Mor On is basically a small time financial markets parasite who is perversely pro Putin, pro Trump, pro Korbyn - easy target for brainwashing by the likes of ZH/RT
Would any firm in the world hire Kavanaugh if he had those women making such claims? No fooking way, and here he is being interview for the job from which he can't be fired for live, most important job in the court system too, pretty crazy that he is still being considered, this only shows the truth side of the Republican Party
Outrageous isn't it
"Is someone you don't like allowed to say something you don't like? If that is the case then we have free speech."- Elon Musk
Just maybe leave the decision to those who can hear and review all the evidence rather than just things they've seen in the headlines. Is that more accurate, less biased? Probably not , but it's a slight improvement
Comment