Originally posted by TestMangler
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
M8 Yer Dugs A Nazi
Collapse
X
-
-
It's amazing that with all these laws and deterrents in place that something like Rotherham could have happened.Comment
-
Originally posted by NotAllThere View PostSelf-evident twaddle.
The offensiveness of any statement is subjective. According to your "logic" either everyone is permitted to say anything, or all communication is prohibited.
Except for direct calls to violence, or inciting criminal acts - they can say what they want.
I said that was true for 'comedy' acts etc. you've just then extrapolated it out to all of Joe public, which is not what I said.
The best way to challenge an ideology, is to allow people to express themselves and then, they can have their 'arguments' intellectually challenged.
It's snowflakes that want to control the words people are allowed to speak.
HTHOriginally posted by Old GregI admit I'm just a lazy, lying cretinous hypocrite and must be going deaf♕Keep calm & carry on♕Comment
-
Originally posted by Old Greg View PostThe context I posted changes the picture significantly. If someone is going to publish such videos on the Internet, then they deserve to be convicted in accordance with the law. If you had wanted to engage honsetly, you would have included the context, rather than just referencing the 'it's just a joke' pre-amble.
"A YouTube video maker who was fined for training a dog to perform a Nazi salute on camera"
So how exactly have I been wanting to engage in a less than honest way?
What I said is true - namely, that in the video (he posted online - duh), he pre-ambled it with "this is a joke, yada yada" - but the judge didn't agree (and so he was convicted - duh).
Completely accurate and completely fair - now tell me, what I have posted in this thread that is wrong... I'll hold my breath shall I?
Also;
Q2: Have you actually watched the original clip of him and the pug?
- I think I know what your answer would be, given your two previous posts.....Originally posted by Old GregI admit I'm just a lazy, lying cretinous hypocrite and must be going deaf♕Keep calm & carry on♕Comment
-
Originally posted by Bean View PostThe original post by minestrone included the following quote;
"A YouTube video maker who was fined for training a dog to perform a Nazi salute on camera"
So how exactly have I been wanting to engage in a less than honest way?
What I said is true - namely, that in the video (he posted online - duh), he pre-ambled it with "this is a joke, yada yada" - but the judge didn't agree (and so he was convicted - duh).
Completely accurate and completely fair - now tell me, what I have posted in this thread that is wrong... I'll hold my breath shall I?
Also;
Q2: Have you actually watched the original clip of him and the pug?
- I think I know what your answer would be, given your two previous posts.....Old Greg - In search of acceptance since Mar 2007. Hoping each leap will be his last.Comment
-
Originally posted by Zigenare View PostYou cannot fight the court of public opinion. Unfortunately the Judge in this case didn't have the balls to stand up and try.
You do live in your own little dystopian world. Seems a fairly angry, miserable place.Down with racism. Long live miscegenation!Comment
-
Originally posted by NotAllThere View PostAh ah. Lacked courage rather than interpreted the law as he saw fit. I mean UK judges are always kowtowing to the public opinion. Well known for it.
You do live in your own little dystopian world. Seems a fairly angry, miserable place.Old Greg - In search of acceptance since Mar 2007. Hoping each leap will be his last.Comment
-
Adolph admirers clearly have to be more circumspect about how they honour his memory. I am having one of my balls cut off tomorrow.bloggoth
If everything isn't black and white, I say, 'Why the hell not?'
John Wayne (My guru, not to be confused with my beloved prophet Jeremy Clarkson)Comment
-
Originally posted by Bean View PostThe original post by minestrone included the following quote;
"A YouTube video maker who was fined for training a dog to perform a Nazi salute on camera"
So how exactly have I been wanting to engage in a less than honest way?
What I said is true - namely, that in the video (he posted online - duh), he pre-ambled it with "this is a joke, yada yada" - but the judge didn't agree (and so he was convicted - duh).
Completely accurate and completely fair - now tell me, what I have posted in this thread that is wrong... I'll hold my breath shall I?
Also;
Q2: Have you actually watched the original clip of him and the pug?
- I think I know what your answer would be, given your two previous posts.....
Why did you not mention this when inviting opinion on whether the conviction was justified?
Mark Meechan, 30, recorded his partner’s pug responding to statements such as “gas the Jews” and “sieg heil” by raising its paw before posting the footage on YouTube in April 2016.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Old Greg View PostWhat you said was true but incomplete. By omitting important context, you are engaging in the conversation dishonesty. You have continued to act dishonestly by taking a dishonest view of what constitutes dishonesty.
Why did you not mention this when inviting opinion on whether the conviction was justified?
Tell you what, let's make it even easier for 'the congregation' to see your laziness;
Did you read the article posted in the OP, by minestrone?
It's clearly stated he posted the video to the internet (youtube)
It's clearly stated he was convicted and fined by the Justice system
It's clearly stated (and in the OP quote) that it was "for training a dog to perform a Nazi salute on camera" etc.
(That covers all your intellectual dishonesty and diversion tactics)
It shouldn't be unreasonable to expect that people commenting in the thread, have read the OP article -
Now answer the simple question(s);
Q2: Have you actually watched the original clip of him and the pug?
Q3Did you read the article posted in the OP, by minestrone?
PS. You could say omitting to answer simple question(s) is engaging dishonestly no?
(Always asking but not answering questions is a tried and tested tactic though, I'll give you that)Originally posted by Old GregI admit I'm just a lazy, lying cretinous hypocrite and must be going deaf♕Keep calm & carry on♕Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Streamline Your Retirement with iSIPP: A Solution for Contractor Pensions Sep 1 09:13
- Making the most of pension lump sums: overview for contractors Sep 1 08:36
- Umbrella company tribunal cases are opening up; are your wages subject to unlawful deductions, too? Aug 31 08:38
- Contractors, relabelling 'labour' as 'services' to appear 'fully contracted out' won't dupe IR35 inspectors Aug 31 08:30
- How often does HMRC check tax returns? Aug 30 08:27
- Work-life balance as an IT contractor: 5 top tips from a tech recruiter Aug 30 08:20
- Autumn Statement 2023 tipped to prioritise mental health, in a boost for UK workplaces Aug 29 08:33
- Final reminder for contractors to respond to the umbrella consultation (closing today) Aug 29 08:09
- Top 5 most in demand cyber security contract roles Aug 25 08:38
- Changes to the right to request flexible working are incoming, but how will contractors be affected? Aug 24 08:25
Comment