• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Alabama - WTF!

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #91
    Originally posted by GhostofTarbera View Post
    A bit like shaving for a man


    Sent from my iPhone using Contractor UK Forum
    Women shave too.

    I think Manflu is a far better example.

    Comment


      #92
      One lady in Texas knows how to take revenge: -

      Texas anti-masturbation bill moves closer to becoming law | The Independent

      The Texas Democrat knows her bill has no hope of becoming law, and has introduced it to satirise how women have been affected by targeted healthcare legislation in her state, particularly relating to abortion.

      Comment


        #93
        Originally posted by filthy1980 View Post
        logically some form of criteria has to drawn up and agreed upon then regularly reviewed

        i just have a problem with zealots at either end of the spectrum
        Unfortunately logical criteria don't always go well with medical reality.

        If a blanket ruling of "at x weeks, the foetus has a right to life", then does this override the mother's right to life, if her life is at risk?
        Also, if the foetus has an abnormality that would mean it will not survive outside the womb, where would that fit in the legal argument
        Then there's the people who are happy to have abortions because circumstances change.
        And the consideration of partners, etc.

        It's a minefield and I hate to ever have to make that decision with someone else, or on behalf of them
        …Maybe we ain’t that young anymore

        Comment


          #94
          Originally posted by WTFH View Post
          Unfortunately logical criteria don't always go well with medical reality.

          If a blanket ruling of "at x weeks, the foetus has a right to life", then does this override the mother's right to life, if her life is at risk?
          Also, if the foetus has an abnormality that would mean it will not survive outside the womb, where would that fit in the legal argument
          Then there's the people who are happy to have abortions because circumstances change.
          And the consideration of partners, etc.

          It's a minefield and I hate to ever have to make that decision with someone else, or on behalf of them
          Exceptional cases also need to be considered. What if a woman or girl in very late stages of pregnancy escapes from a man who had been keeping her imprisoned and raping her? She is determined to have an abortion and her doctor agrees that it is in her best interest. How do you solve that dilemma, and is it the place of criminal law to decide that she must progress to a live birth?

          Comment


            #95
            Originally posted by WTFH View Post
            If a blanket ruling of "at x weeks, the foetus has a right to life", then does this override the mother's right to life, if her life is at risk?
            A very long while ago someone I worked with raised this very issue. He said it was simple. Raising a child on your own is awful. And you can always have another child. So you save the mother.

            I hope never to have to be in that position.

            Comment


              #96
              Originally posted by Yorkie62 View Post
              Even with your headings you have opened up a minefield.

              What constitutes movement, an amputated frogs leg can be made to move with electrical impulses, i.e. does an uncontrolled muscular spasm constitute movement.

              similar argument could also be applied to feeding and excretion. I think we all know what you mean but for legal clarity it would have to be defined and then how do you prove that is occurring. You can't see or prove that the Foetus is feeding, and you can't say well its alive so it must be feeding because you are using feeding as one of your 6 proofs of life - a circular argument. the same applies to excretion. I could go on but you get the general idea that you need good unquestionable legal definitions. As has already been said its a minefield out there
              If the parasite were separated from its host, could it move about without you sticking an electrode on it, would the feeding reaction take place (it's autonomic in babies for a short while), can it breathe unaided/minimal aid (premature babies have underdeveloped lungs so do need some help but will swiftly manage on their own), etc etc

              I'm not talking about what's it's doing while still in the womb - what are it's chances of independent survival if it were to be born at the point the termination is being considered. The argument for lowering the time at which a termination should take place is related to the advances in medical science where foetuses born at 20 weeks are now able to survive with the right level of intensive care.

              Comment


                #97
                Originally posted by ladymuck View Post
                If the parasite were separated from its host, could it move about without you sticking an electrode on it, would the feeding reaction take place (it's autonomic in babies for a short while), can it breathe unaided/minimal aid (premature babies have underdeveloped lungs so do need some help but will swiftly manage on their own), etc etc

                I'm not talking about what's it's doing while still in the womb - what are it's chances of independent survival if it were to be born at the point the termination is being considered. The argument for lowering the time at which a termination should take place is related to the advances in medical science where foetuses born at 20 weeks are now able to survive with the right level of intensive care.
                Absolutely agree with your last point.

                Brain the size of a planet and I still have to communicate with morons

                Comment


                  #98
                  Originally posted by ladymuck View Post
                  If the parasite were separated from its host, could it move about without you sticking an electrode on it, would the feeding reaction take place (it's autonomic in babies for a short while), can it breathe unaided/minimal aid (premature babies have underdeveloped lungs so do need some help but will swiftly manage on their own), etc etc

                  I'm not talking about what's it's doing while still in the womb - what are it's chances of independent survival if it were to be born at the point the termination is being considered. The argument for lowering the time at which a termination should take place is related to the advances in medical science where foetuses born at 20 weeks are now able to survive with the right level of intensive care.
                  20 weeks gestation? Possibly very occasionally they may survive.

                  Comment


                    #99
                    The diverse group of lawmakers who passed Alabama’s recent abortion bill

                    Comment


                      Originally posted by Eirikur View Post
                      The diverse group of lawmakers who passed Alabama’s recent abortion bill
                      thank you for your enlightened contribution to the discussion

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X