Should the state let Michael Buerk die to save the NHS money? Should the state let Michael Buerk die to save the NHS money? - Page 6
Page 6 of 6 FirstFirst ... 456
Posts 51 to 53 of 53
  1. #51

    Prof Cunning @ Oxford Uni

    WTFH is always on top

    WTFH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    17,771

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mordac View Post
    Wexham Park. Just saying...

    ‘Major operations are sold in Pakistan and performed by the NHS in London. Patients arrive at Heathrow and are collected and taken to Slough General. Everyone is on the take abusing the system.’

    ...according to the Brexit Party
    Strong and Stable Moderation

  2. #52

    Godlike

    Mordac is a fount of knowledge

    Mordac's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Civilisation-ish
    Posts
    8,762

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by WTFH View Post
    ‘Major operations are sold in Pakistan and performed by the NHS in London. Patients arrive at Heathrow and are collected and taken to Slough General. Everyone is on the take abusing the system.’

    ...according to the Brexit Party
    Source? Or are Mods exempt from such tedium?

    Edit: Surely nobody is that stupid?

    Edit 2: It seems someone is that stupid . Although you attribute a quote from a Brexit Party supporter to the Party themselves. That is ever so slightly disingenuous, don't you think?
    Last edited by Mordac; 7th August 2019 at 20:42.
    His heart is in the right place - shame we can't say the same about his brain...

  3. #53

    Prof Cunning @ Oxford Uni

    WTFH is always on top

    WTFH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    17,771

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mordac View Post
    Source? Or are Mods exempt from such tedium?

    Edit: Surely nobody is that stupid?

    Edit 2: It seems someone is that stupid . Although you attribute a quote from a Brexit Party supporter to the Party themselves. That is ever so slightly disingenuous, don't you think?
    Source:
    Catherine Blaiklock

    Replying to your Edit 2: The person in question is the founder of The Brexit Party and since being pulled up for the lack of facts in her post has left it out there, along with others that are short on fact.
    Is it disingenuous to post a lie, be told it is a lie and leave it out there as a lie? Is that more or less disingenuous than saying the founder of a party is posting something that is linked to that party?
    Strong and Stable Moderation

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •