• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Who would win: Russia or the UK?

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    Rule 1, on page 1 of the book of war, is: “Do not march on Moscow”. Various people have tried it, Napoleon and Hitler, and it is no good. That is the first rule. I do not know whether your Lordships will know Rule 2 of war. It is: “Do not go fighting with your land armies in China”. It is a vast country, with no clearly defined objectives.
    Read more at Bernard Law Montgomery: Rule 1, on page 1 of the book of war, is: “Do not march on... | QuoteTab

    Field Marshal Bernard Law Montgomery

    "Is someone you don't like allowed to say something you don't like? If that is the case then we have free speech."- Elon Musk

    Comment


      #12
      Originally posted by GhostofTarbera View Post
      He should have been about for Euro 2016 where 150 Russian hooligans battered about 3000 English Hooligans
      What do you think Reagan would have done if 150 Russian thugs battered 3000 US citizens?

      Comment


        #13
        Originally posted by AtW View Post
        What do you think Reagan would have done if 150 Russian thugs battered 3000 US citizens?
        Nuclear war


        Sent from my iPhone using Contractor UK Forum

        Comment


          #14
          Originally posted by GhostofTarbera View Post
          Nucular war


          Sent from my iPhone using Contractor UK Forum
          ftfy

          Comment


            #15
            Originally posted by AtW View Post
            What do you think Reagan would have done if 150 Russian thugs battered 3000 US citizens?
            Slightly less than **** all.
            Old Greg - In search of acceptance since Mar 2007. Hoping each leap will be his last.

            Comment


              #16
              Originally posted by sasguru View Post
              But the British have a cunning plan

              "A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves and traitors are not victims, but accomplices," George Orwell

              Comment


                #17
                Originally posted by sasguru View Post
                The scenario only seems to deal with artillery on artillery with no thought that artillery is next to useless where air superiority is not gained. Think of the Falaise Gap or the Road to Basra.
                But I discovered nothing else but depraved, excessive superstition. Pliny the younger

                Comment

                Working...
                X