• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Harry & Meghan stepping down

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #71
    Originally posted by darmstadt View Post
    A troll once said to me:
    It’s remarkable why there is so much resentment towards the likes of Ms Markle, David Lammy, Diane Abbott, Sam Gyimah and Chuka Umunna - I can’t think of a logical reason as to why this might be happening!
    A bunch of hypocrites attracting resentment? Who'd have thunk it...?
    His heart is in the right place - shame we can't say the same about his brain...

    Comment


      #72
      8 pages? Really? Dedicated to 2 young people who are presumably in love but aren't doing what the gammon loving press want them to do.

      Hilarious ..... the red tops have hounded them out of the country, and are now p'd off that their (the red tops) little money spinner is buggering off to the US to make their own money.

      Gammons. Don'tcha just love 'em
      I am what I drink, and I'm a bitter man

      Comment


        #73
        Originally posted by Whorty View Post
        8 pages? Really? Dedicated to 2 young people who are presumably in love but aren't doing what the gammon loving press want them to do.

        Hilarious ..... the red tops have hounded them out of the country, and are now p'd off that their (the red tops) little money spinner is buggering off to the US to make their own money.

        Gammons. Don'tcha just love 'em
        It's quite interesting to see that these, really rather crap media outlets such as the Daily Mail which had over 30 stories about it on their front web page whereas only a couple dedicated to the shooting down of a civilian airliner by Iran which could have severe repercussions for the whole world. It really goes to show what is important to their readership and why this world is so ****ed up now....
        Brexit is having a wee in the middle of the room at a house party because nobody is talking to you, and then complaining about the smell.

        Comment


          #74
          Yeh, the amount of coverage in some papers regarding this boring issue is quite ridiculous.
          bloggoth

          If everything isn't black and white, I say, 'Why the hell not?'
          John Wayne (My guru, not to be confused with my beloved prophet Jeremy Clarkson)

          Comment


            #75
            Sadly..

            For me this is just another example of why a Royal should only marry another royal. Meghan just wants to be a celebrity and make as much out of the situation as she can.

            It is almost certain to end up hurting Harry and with a divorce and a lot of damage to the institution of the Monarchy.

            The only way to preserve a Monarchy is for those in line to be dedicated to public duties and to avoid any personal interests.

            Sadly they both need to loose their titles and be pushed out, in the interest of the overall preservation of there even being a Royal family.

            I am strongly a Monarchist though I lived overseas for 12 years even that was in one of our remaining territories.

            Comment


              #76
              For me this is just another example of why a Royal should only marry another royal
              Good idea, It didn't do the Habsburgs any harm!
              bloggoth

              If everything isn't black and white, I say, 'Why the hell not?'
              John Wayne (My guru, not to be confused with my beloved prophet Jeremy Clarkson)

              Comment


                #77
                The way they announced it seems like a deliberate insult to the Queen. Or if not an insult, at least publicly disrespectful. Why would they do that? Barmy. Or deluded.

                Some newspapers are saying it has all been plotted for ages, was Meghan's plan all along, and reading far too much into it. Daft. We can't know what is going on inside a relationship or what passes in the minds of others. Just take events at face value.

                Happy to pay for their ongoing security, but little else. And the titles will have to go. Lastly, as someone pointed out above, a "transatlantic lifestyle" = environmental homicide.

                Comment


                  #78
                  Originally posted by unixman View Post
                  The way they announced it seems like a deliberate insult to the Queen. Or if not an insult, at least publicly disrespectful. Why would they do that? Barmy. Or deluded.

                  Some newspapers are saying it has all been plotted for ages, was Meghan's plan all along, and reading far too much into it. Daft. We can't know what is going on inside a relationship or what passes in the minds of others. Just take events at face value.

                  Happy to pay for their ongoing security, but little else. And the titles will have to go. Lastly, as someone pointed out above, a "transatlantic lifestyle" = environmental homicide.
                  Hmm...

                  I'm not so keen on paying for their security. If they don't want to be part of the royal family then they shouldn't get any of the services that the tax payer funds. Who is going to pay for their Canadian lifestyle? The Brits certainly shouldn't but I also don't think it's fair to lump it on the Canadians either.

                  Comment


                    #79
                    Originally posted by ladymuck View Post
                    Hmm...

                    I'm not so keen on paying for their security. If they don't want to be part of the royal family then they shouldn't get any of the services that the tax payer funds. Who is going to pay for their Canadian lifestyle? The Brits certainly shouldn't but I also don't think it's fair to lump it on the Canadians either.

                    I would prefer to stop this waste and let Tony B'liar take his chances...

                    Tony Blair's police protection costs taxpayers millions, report claims | Politics | The Guardian

                    Blair requires as many as 12 police protection officers following his role as prime minister and his advocacy of the invasion of Iraq in 2003, a Daily Telegraph investigation published on Friday claims.Documents seen by the Telegraph allegedly show that Blair sometimes visits as many as five countries a week, at a potential cost of between £14,000 and £16,000 to the public purse. The paper reports that each protection officer was likely to be earning at least £56,000, but could earn more than £70,000 given the overtime they accumulate on foreign trips.

                    In 2010 the Mail on Sunday reported that the cost of Blair’s diplomatic protection was £250,000 a year, double the cost for Gordon Brown.
                    Always forgive your enemies; nothing annoys them so much.

                    Comment


                      #80
                      Originally posted by vetran View Post
                      I would prefer to stop this waste and let Tony B'liar take his chances...

                      Tony Blair's police protection costs taxpayers millions, report claims | Politics | The Guardian
                      FFS

                      If someone bumped off the war criminal I doubt anyone would really care.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X