Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
I find Conspirarcy theories quite tiresome especially the Official ones - I prefer to apply the principal follow the money - case in point is that chap in the US who is offering 5k in US dollars for anyone who can prove COVID-SARS2 actually can be proven to exist by using the current testing methods - now my first instinct was to debunk this claim as I could really use the 5k - but alas I was stumped.
However I thought of those out of work CUKers who have had a tough time of late - could really benefit from this amazing challenge - well Time will tell .
I find Conspirarcy theories quite tiresome especially the Official ones - I prefer to apply the principal follow the money - case in point is that chap in the US who is offering 5k in US dollars for anyone who can prove COVID-SARS2 actually can be proven to exist by using the current testing methods - now my first instinct was to debunk this claim as I could really use the 5k - but alas I was stumped.
However I thought of those out of work CUKers who have had a tough time of late - could really benefit from this amazing challenge - well Time will tell .
He is saying that he will give 5k to anyone who offers a proof which he accepts to be true. If he doesn't accept a proof to be true, what do you believe that demonstrates?
A better 5k spend would have been on finding clear answer on simple question - is it the Internet that made people so dumb to believe in obvious fraud like that or they were dumb before and the Internet just exposed them.
One could have probably written cracking PhD on the subject, if it wasn’t for ethical rules.
A better 5k spend would have been on finding clear answer on simple question - is it the Internet that made people so dumb to believe in obvious fraud like that or they were dumb before and the Internet just exposed them.
One could have probably written cracking PhD on the subject, if it wasn’t for ethical rules.
There's a feedback loop. It ends with pooper treating himself as a contrarian indicator and always taking the opposite position to the one he is taking.
Comment