• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Right-wing academics ‘forced to hide views’

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    AIUI, the anonymity of the complainant is at risk if the accused is named. This is why the whip has not been removed from the Conservative former minister.
    ---

    Former member of IPSE.


    ---
    Many a mickle makes a muckle.

    ---

    Comment


      Originally posted by wattaj View Post
      AIUI, the anonymity of the complainant is at risk if the accused is named. This is why the whip has not been removed from the Conservative former minister.

      Ah that makes sense. Knew there would be a reason.

      Does that mean the boys can put their pitchforks away?
      Always forgive your enemies; nothing annoys them so much.

      Comment


        Originally posted by wattaj View Post
        AIUI, the anonymity of the complainant is at risk if the accused is named. This is why the whip has not been removed from the Conservative former minister.

        The whip could have been removed when the complaint was made, before it was publicly known.
        But by doing it the other way, the arrested suspect and his political party get to claim to be the victims in some crime, while the person who claims they were raped is seen as guilty and should never have said anything.
        …Maybe we ain’t that young anymore

        Comment


          Originally posted by WTFH View Post
          The whip could have been removed when the complaint was made, before it was publicly known.
          But by doing it the other way, the arrested suspect and his political party get to claim to be the victims in some crime, while the person who claims they were raped is seen as guilty and should never have said anything.
          In your opinion. Careful of the pricks on the pitchforks.
          Always forgive your enemies; nothing annoys them so much.

          Comment


            Originally posted by vetran View Post
            In your opinion. Careful of the pricks on the pitchforks.

            Charlie Elphicke: Ex-MP jailed for sex assaults on women - BBC News
            …Maybe we ain’t that young anymore

            Comment



              Ah so someone completely different was tried and found guilty? What has that got to do with your pitchfork fetish? Are all male white MPs guilty by default?
              Always forgive your enemies; nothing annoys them so much.

              Comment


                Originally posted by vetran View Post
                Ah so someone completely different was tried and found guilty? What has that got to do with your pitchfork fetish? Are all male white MPs guilty by default?
                Careful snowflake!

                Originally posted by darmstadt View Post
                So why did they do that for Elphicke?
                …Maybe we ain’t that young anymore

                Comment


                  Originally posted by WTFH View Post
                  Careful snowflake!
                  Hmm the question asked has been answered repeatedly in the thread, go on read it, ask if you have any difficulty with the long words.
                  Always forgive your enemies; nothing annoys them so much.

                  Comment


                    Originally posted by vetran View Post
                    Hmm the question asked has been answered repeatedly in the thread, go on read it, ask if you have any difficulty with the long words.

                    Which question has been answered?

                    And the post I quoted was on page 12 of this thread. It has not been "answered repeatedly"
                    …Maybe we ain’t that young anymore

                    Comment


                      Originally posted by WTFH View Post
                      Which question has been answered?

                      And the post I quoted was on page 12 of this thread. It has not been "answered repeatedly"

                      Try earlier in the thread just because Darmy repeats such questions with different wording doesn't mean it wasn't answered.
                      Always forgive your enemies; nothing annoys them so much.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X