My post count is Majestic
SueEllen is always on top
"You’re just a bad memory who doesn’t know when to go away" JR
My post count is Majestic
SueEllen is always on top
"You’re just a bad memory who doesn’t know when to go away" JR
That’s the issue - adenovirus vector more traditional vaccines appear to be far behind newer mRNA stuff: 70% vs 95% is 6 times more sick people (30% vs 5%).
Cheap, easy to manufacture - that’s good, it is great vaccine for 3rd world but I personally would think twice before taking it, the price of mRNA is 1 round of beers.
Over 50%, but in what age groups? When it's 95% you know it covers all ages nicely, but if it's 50% then seems VERY likely it's much higher in lower age groups and lower in older age groups (the ones we really need to protect!), so now it turns out 90%+ was in age group of under 55, well that explains a lot, though having said that if vaccine reduces severity of Covid then it's also ok even if it's not completely preventing it.
All in all that looks bad compared to mRNA