• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Congestion charge

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    Originally posted by Euro-commuter
    I have read 20% reduction, but the big advantage is more funds for public transport. Not a bad idea since most people won't stop using their cars until the working public transport system is already in place; even if it does smack a little of being told that you will pay for public transport, whether you use it or not.

    Trouble is, good public transport makes sense for everybody, but the cheapskate British don't want to up the money for it. I suspect they bought Thatcher's old snake oil that you could pay less taxes and not lose out by it, and won't give up that idea in the face of the evidence.
    I believe that it was initially a 20% reduction, but the last figure I heard was that it had fallen back to around 8%.
    I think you would find that the cheapskate British public would be delighted to fund a decent public transport system if only Phoney Bliar would use the money he intends to spend on his Police State to fund it, and if El Gordo would stop pissing the rest of the money he extorts out of us up against a wall.
    Boom boom boom boom
    A-haw haw haw haw
    Hmmm hmmm hmmm hmmm
    Hmmm hmmm hmmm hmmm

    Comment


      #12
      Originally posted by Euro-commuter
      but the big advantage is more funds for public transport..
      |Is that why Tube & Bus fares have risen 200% since London charging came in?
      How fortunate for governments that the people they administer don't think

      Comment


        #13
        In theory, these charges are a good idea. Motorists pay for a superb public transport system. Brilliant, where do I sign?

        The reality is that none of the money will go on transport of any kind (except maybe MP's travel allowances).

        No, all the money collected will go on civil servics non-jobs (50%), public sector pensions (10%), pointless wars (25%), benefits for the terminally unemployable/asylum seekers/other socialist clap-trap (15%).

        So you can stick it up your

        Comment


          #14
          Originally posted by hyperD
          I think it's pretty much one already...
          I thought the M25 was a car park...
          "Never argue with stupid people, they will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience". Mark Twain

          Comment


            #15
            I blame the Germans. had they done a better job on our cities in the first half of the 1940's then we too could have rebuilt in such a way to allow for a better public transport system.

            Anybody moaning about public transport wants to try the public transport outside the capital. It is much worse.
            Rule Number 1 - Assuming that you have a valid contract in place always try to get your poo onto your timesheet, provided that the timesheet is valid for your current contract and covers the period of time that you are billing for.

            I preferred version 1!

            Comment


              #16
              Originally posted by ratewhore
              Quite right. Much better just to spend billions on a national road charging system...


              ...which won't work - obviously!!

              On the Beeb's website there is an article about road pricing and the petition which says "Transport Secretary Douglas Alexander has reportedly been unhappy that opponents of the scheme have been given such a voice." Well Mr Alexander, that's called democracy. Unbelievable.
              It's my opinion and I'm entitled to it. www.areyoupopular.mobi

              Comment


                #17
                If a man finds himself on a bus and is older than 26 years old, he should consider himself a failure in life - M. Thatcher.

                Comment


                  #18
                  Wise words.

                  If a Contractor finds himself in a Skoda, and it isn't a taxi, he should consider himself a failure.

                  Comment


                    #19
                    If a contractor does not have a ferrari by the age of 35 he should consider himself a failure.

                    Threaded

                    Comment


                      #20
                      Originally posted by andy
                      If a contractor does not have a ferrari by the age of 35 he should consider himself a failure.

                      Threaded
                      Tugger lol!

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X