The council 'fat cat’ earning £570,000 The council 'fat cat’ earning £570,000
Posts 1 to 9 of 9
  1. #1

    More fingers than teeth

    TimberWolf is too good to be a permie

    TimberWolf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    17,505

    Default The council 'fat cat’ earning £570,000

    He received his normal salary of £157,000, including the notice period. He also collected a redundancy payment of £167,000, even though he had worked for the council for just six years. The council also agreed to pay an extra £239,000 into Mr Dolan's gold-plated pension scheme to cover payments that would have been made had he continued working until 65.

    South Somerset has only 162,000 residents (one of the smallest) , meaning that the payments to the three men cost more than £7 a person.

    Last week, council leader Tim Carroll put his name to a letter to Mr Pickles stating that cuts would have “an undoubted impact on all front-line council services, including care to the vulnerable”.
    The council 'fat cat’ earning £570,000 - Telegraph
    Imagine the size of his package if it had been a big council

  2. #2

    Super poster

    centurian has more data than eek


    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    2,837

    Default

    The argument around these stratospheric salaries for council employees was that we needed to pay top rates for the best people.

    But what happened - did top people from successful private sector industries flock to councils and turn them around.

    No - they're all career council employees. All we did was pay the same people shed loads more money to do exactly the same job they would have done anyway. We've paid out 10s of millions extra for absolutely zilch in return.


  3. #3

    Double Godlike!

    Paddy is a fount of knowledge

    Paddy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    10,509

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TimberWolf View Post
    Imagine the size of his package if it had been a big council
    Appointments of such have to go through a resolution by elected councillors. It is obviously that the councillors have been negligent and they can be held personally liable for losses if the rate payers got together and take action. The problem is that the majority of the people in the UK are gutless that is why people get away wit it.
    Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity

    我们不是病毒

  4. #4

    More fingers than teeth

    xoggoth is a fount of knowledge

    xoggoth's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    xoggoth towers
    Posts
    13,791

    Default

    Quite. I daresay there are few who merit it. In public sector jobs there is no independent measure of effectiveness, as profit provides in the private sector.
    bloggoth

    If everything isn't black and white, I say, 'Why the hell not?'
    John Wayne (My guru, not to be confused with my beloved prophet Jeremy Clarkson)

  5. #5

    Super poster

    centurian has more data than eek


    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    2,837

    Default

    They justify it by comparing their salary to the "millions in efficiency savings" that they have made - and that if anything, they are cheap. It would have cost the council millions had they not been there.

    Of course, this is all tulip. For starters an "efficiency saving" hardly ever saves hard cash - in fact it can sometimes cost more. By 'efficiency' they usually mean they have delivered "a better service for more money", but the consultants and accountants spin it as a "saving" on the basis that the "cost per unit" is lower, even though the total cash bill is higher.

    Short term, you can get away with this, but long-term you are tulliped, because you've hidden the underlying issues.

    Secondly, even if there is a saving, who's to say that someone on 60K couldn't have made that saving anyway. Some of these "savings" are pretty basic stuff. What is so special about these people that mean only they could have done it.

  6. #6

    Super poster

    fullyautomatix 's job has never been outsourced

    fullyautomatix's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Gaul
    Posts
    4,567

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by centurian View Post
    The argument around these stratospheric salaries for council employees was that we needed to pay top rates for the best people.

    But what happened - did top people from successful private sector industries flock to councils and turn them around.

    No - they're all career council employees. All we did was pay the same people shed loads more money to do exactly the same job they would have done anyway. We've paid out 10s of millions extra for absolutely zilch in return.

    WHS

    On top of that, another justification I have seen is the fat cats claiming that they need to pay high salaries because of the millions of quids they are in charge of. Therefore they need to pay themselves private sector wages. The only difference is that in private sector the high paid executives are in charge of producing millions in profit and not spending millions.

    It's time we had a major revolt against sky high council tax and the 60K salaries these fat cats are awarding themselves just for a 9-5 pen pushing and tea drinking.

  7. #7

    The beerded one

    EternalOptimist is NOT a disguised employee

    EternalOptimist's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Castle Saburac
    Posts
    22,444

    Default

    i have a slightly different take on this. if it was all so obviously easy, wouldnt there be a massive queue of people applying for these jobs
    with headhunters involved


    has anyone here ever been headhunted ?


    (\__/)
    (>'.'<)
    ("")("") Born to Drink. Forced to Work

  8. #8

    Super poster

    centurian has more data than eek


    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    2,837

    Default

    The entry criteria is so tight that it is impossible for anyone other than deputy chief execs of councils or "captains of industry" to apply, much like top jobs for investment bankers.

    However, this guy lied about his qualifications and experience - and yet was still able to do the job without his competance being question. He was only caught out by background checks.

    Convicted conman, 49, used fake CV to win £165k top executive job at City bank | Mail Online

  9. #9

    Contractor Among Contractors

    Freamon is too good to be a permie

    Freamon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    1,890

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by fullyautomatix View Post
    It's time we had a major revolt against sky high council tax and the 60K salaries these fat cats are awarding themselves just for a 9-5 pen pushing and tea drinking.
    Let's say that instead of being paid 157k this guy was paid 60k, and his redundancy and pension top up were reduced by a similar amount.

    This would have saved each council tax payer in South Somerset a whole 11p per month last year.
    "A life, Jimmy, you know what that is? It’s the s*** that happens while you’re waiting for moments that never come." -- Lester Freamon

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •