• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Jimmy Savile 'household name' sweep

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #31
    Can't help thinking this is all getting a bit silly now, and possibly even counterproductive.

    After all if they out too many people, won't it simply indicate how much more common kiddy fiddling is than most people like to think? That will actually be reassuring and even encouraging for present day paedos.

    Years ago, before gay liberation and so on, one argument gays would often recite to each other, and anyone else who would listen, was how many famous people past and present were gay.
    Work in the public sector? Read the IR35 FAQ here

    Comment


      #32
      Why not just arrest them all and release the ones who can prove their innocence.

      Comment


        #33
        Originally posted by OwlHoot View Post
        Can't help thinking this is all getting a bit silly now, and possibly even counterproductive.

        After all if they out too many people, won't it simply indicate how much more common kiddy fiddling is than most people like to think? That will actually be reassuring and even encouraging for present day paedos.

        Years ago, before gay liberation and so on, one argument gays would often recite to each other, and anyone else who would listen, was how many famous people past and present were gay.
        Maybe some dangerous predators will end up in prison.

        The example given about homosexuality is depressing even by CUK standards.
        The material prosperity of a nation is not an abiding possession; the deeds of its people are.

        George Frederic Watts

        http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Postman's_Park

        Comment


          #34
          Originally posted by speling bee View Post
          Maybe some dangerous predators will end up in prison.

          The example given about homosexuality is depressing even by CUK standards.
          agree completely.
          Always forgive your enemies; nothing annoys them so much.

          Comment


            #35
            Originally posted by speling bee View Post
            Maybe some dangerous predators will end up in prison.

            The example given about homosexuality is depressing even by CUK standards.
            I wasn't trying to put gays in the same category, or criticising them at all. Just pointing out the parallels.
            Work in the public sector? Read the IR35 FAQ here

            Comment


              #36
              Melvyn Hayes.

              In fact anyone who played a janitor in a kids programme whilst wearing a dirty old coat.

              Comment


                #37
                Originally posted by speling bee View Post
                Maybe some dangerous predators will end up in prison.

                The example given about homosexuality is depressing even by CUK standards.
                Originally posted by vetran View Post
                agree completely.
                Originally posted by OwlHoot View Post
                I wasn't trying to put gays in the same category, or criticising them at all. Just pointing out the parallels.
                Disagree completely with the replies. It's a valid point.

                What happens if pandoras box is opened and all of a sudden we discover that all red blooded males would do it to pubescent 13/14/15 year olds in school skirts, white socks and tight tops if given half the chance?
                What happens in General, stays in General.
                You know what they say about assumptions!

                Comment


                  #38
                  Originally posted by MarillionFan View Post
                  Disagree completely with the replies. It's a valid point.

                  What happens if pandoras box is opened and all of a sudden we discover that all red blooded males would do it to pubescent 13/14/15 year olds in school skirts, white socks and tight tops if given half the chance?
                  Then maybe they should be arrested.

                  Seems a very strange question to ask to be fair.

                  Comment


                    #39
                    Originally posted by moggy View Post
                    Then maybe they should be arrested.

                    Seems a very strange question to ask to be fair.
                    Arrested for what? Jimmy Saville is being accused of being a pedophile. The very definition relates to pre-pubescent children <11. Of the 300 odd cases we here it's all >13/14. Mostly around the 15/16 range.

                    He's more classified as a ephebobphile / teleiophiles which relate to 15/16/17 age range, any younger (pubescent, then hebephiliac).

                    Men are biologically attraced to younger women, it's a natural reaction. A guy cannot help but look at a shapely body walking down the road. Society places an age of 16 based on the definition of a 'child' for legal purposes but like homosexuality you have a genetic prediliction for it.
                    What happens in General, stays in General.
                    You know what they say about assumptions!

                    Comment


                      #40
                      Originally posted by MarillionFan View Post
                      Men are biologically attraced to younger women, it's a natural reaction. A guy cannot help but look at a shapely body walking down the road. Society places an age of 16 based on the definition of a 'child' for legal purposes but like homosexuality you have a genetic prediliction for it.
                      So why do so many men like MILFs?
                      And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X