• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Amazon Corporation Tax

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    Originally posted by sasguru View Post
    I'm as guilty as anyone in using Amazon for almost everything, due to the ocnvenience.
    But I don't like that they're becoming a monopoly, especially on books.
    Platypus mentioned price rises, believe me these are coming when Amazon achieves complete dominance in the market, always happens with a monopoly.
    WHS, and I like even less that fact that whatever one searches on in Google, even if it is obviously preposterously non-existent, a string of Amazon results pop up but it turns out that "This item is currently unavailable". So in other words, they're obviously just fielding every search regardless.
    Work in the public sector? Read the IR35 FAQ here

    Comment


      #12
      Originally posted by proggy View Post
      UK Sales 4.3 Bn
      Corporation Tax 2.5 million
      but they got government grants of 2.5 million.

      I need the number of their accountant!
      Originally posted by VectraMan View Post
      CORPORATION TAX IS NOT BASED ON SALES!!!!

      Sorry, it gets annoying hearing this same lie repeated again and again and again on the TV, in the newspapers and even on forums like this where as Ltd. company owners people really ought to know what corporation tax is.
      Originally posted by proggy View Post
      Where do I say it is? Learn how to comprehend simple sentences before ranting.
      Coffee's for closers

      Comment


        #13
        Originally posted by BoredBloke View Post
        No you don't...its simple! All you need is a subsidiary in another country where the corp tax is a nominal amount, or where you can strike a deal with the government so that it's a nominal amount and then get that part of your business to provide a service at an extortionate cost to the main business. You'll wipe out your profits in the country or countries where you make the profit and its gets transferred to the country where you have the cheap corp tax deal. Starbucks do this in Switzerland. They source their coffee beans through the Swiss part of their company and it flogs them, at a hugely inflated price to the rest of the business, ensuring that they make no profit in each country except for Switzerland

        So they are exploiting a loophole then.

        If the UK government wants to, it can easily crack down on this sort of thing.

        Easy thing to sort out, if you have UK sales of a billion quid and you pay a nominal amount in corp tax, examine the records and impose a heavy fine on them which is equivalent to the tax they avoided plus a big interest.
        Vote Corbyn ! Save this country !

        Comment


          #14
          The point is, if 100's of global large corporations operate in the UK and pay little or no tax, where do you think HMR&C will fill the shortfall?

          That's right, the much easier to bully and tax SME segment.

          And anyone who thinks tax dodging leads to lower prices is fooling themselves. The lower tax means higher profits and bigger management bonus payments.

          Comment


            #15
            Originally posted by Spacecadet View Post
            Ah so I used the word sales then in another sentence corporation tax, I can see how an idiot would read that as me saying corp tax is on sales.

            My point was they got grants covering their corporation tax so effectively paid 0.

            Also although corp tax is not calculated from sales with a profitable company you would expect there would be relationship between them. i.e you wouldn't expect a company with sales of 200k to have a corp tax bill of 500k. Or a company with sales of 4bn to have corp tax of £10 without some tax avoidance measures.

            Comment


              #16
              Originally posted by proggy View Post
              Ah so I used the word sales then in another sentence corporation tax, I can see how an idiot would read that as me saying corp tax is on sales.

              My point was they got grants covering their corporation tax so effectively paid 0.

              Also although corp tax is not calculated from sales with a profitable company you would expect there would be relationship between them. i.e you wouldn't expect a company with sales of 200k to have a corp tax bill of 500k. Or a company with sales of 4bn to have corp tax of £10 without some tax avoidance measures.
              I know what you meant and you're still equating sales with tax

              Tax is only on profit. It's perfectly within reason for a company to have £4bn in sales and still be making a loss, how do you think the likes of HMV end up in liquidation?
              Coffee's for closers

              Comment


                #17
                Originally posted by Spacecadet View Post
                I know what you meant and you're still equating sales with tax

                Tax is only on profit. It's perfectly within reason for a company to have £4bn in sales and still be making a loss, how do you think the likes of HMV end up in liquidation?
                Paid their tax bills?

                Comment


                  #18
                  Originally posted by Spacecadet View Post
                  I know what you meant and you're still equating sales with tax

                  Tax is only on profit. It's perfectly within reason for a company to have £4bn in sales and still be making a loss, how do you think the likes of HMV end up in liquidation?
                  The reason I said PROFITABLE company. Oh my god, it's like talking to a retard and having to explain the meaning of each word.

                  Comment


                    #19
                    Originally posted by proggy View Post
                    The reason I said PROFITABLE company. Oh my god, it's like talking to a retard and having to explain the meaning of each word.
                    You used the word profitable in a different sentence so it doesn't count

                    Originally posted by proggy View Post
                    Ah so I used the word sales then in another sentence corporation tax, I can see how an idiot would read that as me saying corp tax is on sales.
                    Seriously. Don't go equating corp tax with sales then blame everyone else for "misunderstanding" you
                    Coffee's for closers

                    Comment


                      #20
                      How can the UK Govt stop this ?

                      Originally posted by fullyautomatix View Post
                      So they are exploiting a loophole then.

                      If the UK government wants to, it can easily crack down on this sort of thing.

                      Easy thing to sort out, if you have UK sales of a billion quid and you pay a nominal amount in corp tax, examine the records and impose a heavy fine on them which is equivalent to the tax they avoided plus a big interest.
                      This is how it works based on a previous IT configurations

                      The Principle or holding company owns the stock ie coffee beans
                      The principle has a contract or controls the source of supply ie in Latin America. The selling company ie UK company orders the beans from the principle and the Latin American company delivers the coffee beans directly to the UK company

                      The Latin American company sells the beans to the Principle at 25p. The Principle sells the beans to UK company at 225p paying tax on 200p. The UK company Sells at 300p and pays tax on 75p less admin which equals 0. Therefore pays no UK corporation tax

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X