• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Professionalism II

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #21
    Originally posted by TheFaQQer View Post
    If you can give notice and want to leave, then give notice and leave.

    If you can't give notice and want to leave, then either leave at the end of the contract, or get a substitute in for the duration of the contract.

    Act like a business, get treated like a business. Act like a c*** and you get treated like a c***.
    ...or fold your limited company up and walk away that day.

    Comment


      #22
      Originally posted by SaltyLevels View Post
      ...or fold your limited company up and walk away that day.
      Seems a little extreme to shut down your company just so that you can leave a contract.
      Best Forum Advisor 2014
      Work in the public sector? You can read my FAQ here
      Click here to get 15% off your first year's IPSE membership

      Comment


        #23
        In over 25 years of contracting I've never had this but as people have said, I would act professional having looked at the notice period on my contract and contacted other companies (agencies, consultancies, etc.) to say that I would be available for interviews and could leave shortly after an offer had been made. The nearest I have come to this was when an agency said that the payment terms would have to change as the client was on a 90 day payment schedule with them and so that would be my new schedule. I refused saying that I could quite easily leave next week (1 weeks notice) and it was dropped)
        Brexit is having a wee in the middle of the room at a house party because nobody is talking to you, and then complaining about the smell.

        Comment


          #24
          Originally posted by scooterscot View Post

          All n all, the finance sector must be one very different sector from engineering.
          Whilst it's true someone at the top makes those choices they must have a degree of confidence they can pick those people up again at short notice and at a reduced rate. Otherwise why take the risk? Thinking of cash machine failures and similar stories in the news over the last year, not that I suspect those event are connected.
          It is. From my own experience (which might not reflect the experience of others), finance is very much about short term gains. Engineering companies are often carrying out projects that have a 2 or more year build followed by a 10 to 20 year payback, and clientco's customer notices changes to the staff, will ask questions and will be very angry if he feels those changes have led to disappointing performance.
          And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

          Comment


            #25
            Originally posted by Jubber View Post
            Now then ....

            In light of what RBS has just decided was a good commercial decision, what does the great and the good () on this forum now think of 'professionalism'?

            (For those who don't know - RBS has given its contractors a take it or leave 10% rate cut)

            If the clients behave like this - how should we? Should we send an email to the client/agency mid contract and demand a 10% uplift by the end of the week or we walk? Professional? Or good commercial decision?
            What goes up must come down. You lot make me laugh. You think nothing of asking for a "rate rise" and clients rarely regard you doing so as unprofessional. So what is unprofessional about them imposing a rate reduction? If you don't like it walk - don't whine. I am sure they can get some cheap Indian resource to replace you.
            Let us not forget EU open doors immigration benefits IT contractors more than anyone

            Comment


              #26
              Originally posted by d000hg View Post
              I don't think that's true. You're professional because you're professional, not because the other party is.
              Originally posted by d000hg View Post
              Walking when they act unprofessionally is fine, as long as you do so in a professional manner rather than saying "screw you I'm not putting up with this tulip"
              Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
              Indeed, there's no need to be nasty or insulting about it; it's a business decision and nothing personal.
              +1
              Growing old is mandatory
              Growing up is optional

              Comment


                #27
                Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
                It is. From my own experience (which might not reflect the experience of others), finance is very much about short term gains. Engineering companies are often carrying out projects that have a 2 or more year build followed by a 10 to 20 year payback, and clientco's customer notices changes to the staff, will ask questions and will be very angry if he feels those changes have led to disappointing performance.
                That is not correct. Engineering companies such as Bechtel, Wood Group, Fluor often work on a T&M basis on margins set by their clients.
                Let us not forget EU open doors immigration benefits IT contractors more than anyone

                Comment


                  #28
                  Originally posted by DodgyAgent View Post
                  That is not correct. Engineering companies such as Bechtel, Wood Group, Fluor often work on a T&M basis on margins set by their clients.
                  Well not the engineering companies here in Brabant.


                  I did also point out; 'From my own experience (which might not reflect the experience of others)', because I assume other posters are functionally literate.
                  Last edited by Mich the Tester; 24 April 2014, 09:23.
                  And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

                  Comment


                    #29
                    Originally posted by DodgyAgent View Post
                    What goes up must come down. You lot make me laugh. You think nothing of asking for a "rate rise" and clients rarely regard you doing so as unprofessional. So what is unprofessional about them imposing a rate reduction? If you don't like it walk - don't whine. I am sure they can get some cheap Indian resource to replace you.
                    I think the key point is 'mid contract'.

                    If they offered an extension at a lower rate then it might be professional.

                    If you asked for a rate rise mid contract that might be seen as unprofessional.
                    Always forgive your enemies; nothing annoys them so much.

                    Comment


                      #30
                      Originally posted by DodgyAgent View Post
                      That is not correct. Engineering companies such as Bechtel, Wood Group, Fluor often work on a T&M basis on margins set by their clients.
                      and they're not afraid of cutting rates mid contract when the market allows them to.
                      Public Service Posting by the BBC - Bloggs Bulls**t Corp.
                      Officially CUK certified - Thick as f**k.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X