• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

A million tax pounds

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #41
    Originally posted by speling bee View Post
    Another approach is to be blind to your own individual circumstances. What system would you have if you didn't know what your place was going to be within the economy.
    Yes also taken from game theory but in the case of taxation it's rather hard to achieve in practice. The only way I can think of to implement such a blind system would be to draw tax rates by lot, and it seems intuitively obvious (I'm without proof obviously ) that a flat rate system is the logical outcome of that.
    While you're waiting, read the free novel we sent you. It's a Spanish story about a guy named 'Manual.'

    Comment


      #42
      Originally posted by doodab View Post
      Yes also taken from game theory but in the case of taxation it's rather hard to achieve in practice. The only way I can think of to implement such a blind system would be to draw tax rates by lot, and it seems intuitively obvious (I'm without proof obviously ) that a flat rate system is the logical outcome of that.
      But you've already said (I think) that you want a tax free allowance, so you have a tiered system, which you don't want.
      The material prosperity of a nation is not an abiding possession; the deeds of its people are.

      George Frederic Watts

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Postman's_Park

      Comment


        #43
        Originally posted by speling bee View Post
        But you've already said (I think) that you want a tax free allowance, so you have a tiered system, which you don't want.
        It wouldn't be tiered. The tax free allowance would be the same for everyone. I also think people should be allowed to group together and combine their tax allowances e.g. as stakeholders in corporations. So they can use their tax free allowance and pay their tax on their share of an income stream at the corporate, or family, or individual level.

        I think you would need a similar blind decision system to set the tax free threshold. Going back to the ideas of the system being equitable and envy free, most people in society would be better off with a tax free allowance so they would chose that over a system without it.

        The main problem is that the rate of tax would need to be determined by the budgetary constraints rather than giving people a choice and it would need to be close to 40% to be revenue neutral with respect to the current system. Even though many people in the so called "squeezed middle" would be better off under such a scheme they would object to becoming 40% tax payers.
        Last edited by doodab; 12 May 2014, 16:06.
        While you're waiting, read the free novel we sent you. It's a Spanish story about a guy named 'Manual.'

        Comment


          #44
          I don't know why there's been such a fuss about Gary Barlow.

          Whatever he said, whatever he did, he didn't mean it.




          Best Forum Advisor 2014
          Work in the public sector? You can read my FAQ here
          Click here to get 15% off your first year's IPSE membership

          Comment


            #45
            Originally posted by TheFaQQer View Post
            I don't know why there's been such a fuss about Gary Barlow.

            Whatever he said, whatever he did, he didn't mean it.




            Let us not forget EU open doors immigration benefits IT contractors more than anyone

            Comment

            Working...
            X