Originally posted by webberg
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Montpelier DTA scheme bulletin
Collapse
X
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by PokemonStay View PostThe montpelier approach is to delay the inevitable. By endless legal actions that have NO chance of success.
Obviously I can't comment on Montpelier.Best Forum Adviser & Forum Personality of the Year 2018.
(No, me neither).Comment
-
Originally posted by webberg View PostAh - sorry - my bad.
Obviously I can't comment on Montpelier.
However WG still reads this thread. Hi WGComment
-
Originally posted by PokemonStay View PostThe montpelier approach was to delay the inevitable. By endless legal actions that had NO chance of success.merely at clientco for the entertainmentComment
-
Utter folly
Anyone who doesn't take Corrective Action, on the basis of the deluded crap coming out of Montpelier, seriously wants their head testing. (Ditto for people who are stupid enough to repay 10% of the loans for the loan scheme.)
Take this path and you are almost certainly going to wind up with a 50% penalty.
And don't come back here crying when it happens.
WG has been billing people hundreds of pounds, in some cases thousands, for crappy Letters of Representation. Imagine the bill you'll get from him if you join his Judicial Review circus.Scoots still says that Apr 2020 didn't mark the start of a new stock bull market.Comment
-
Originally posted by DealorNoDeal View PostAnyone who doesn't take Corrective Action, on the basis of the deluded crap coming out of Montpelier, seriously wants their head testing. (Ditto for people who are stupid enough to repay 10% of the loans for the loan scheme.)
Take this path and you are almost certainly going to wind up with a 50% penalty.
And don't come back here crying when it happens.
WG has been billing people hundreds of pounds, in some cases thousands, for crappy Letters of Representation. Imagine the bill you'll get from him if you join his Judicial Review circus.
I would like to see what WG has to say about this.
To be fair to WG, it was hard to see retrospective legislation coming. However, since that was lost, so is the whole case.Comment
-
Originally posted by PokemonStay View PostOne person has asked for their 10% back. They did not get it.Scoots still says that Apr 2020 didn't mark the start of a new stock bull market.Comment
-
Originally posted by PokemonStay View PostI disagree. Your analysis is too mild. One person has asked for their 10% back. They did not get it.
I would like to see what WG has to say about this.
To be fair to WG, it was hard to see retrospective legislation coming. However, since that was lost, so is the whole case.
So where are they gitface? You havent submitted one of these others, have you? Oh and what exactly did you advise Huitson to do again when you blew the late appeal?Comment
-
Email From Montpelier
Has anyone else had this or similar email from Montpelier:
"Upon checking our records, I note that you have not advised if a response has been received to the letters of representation submitted to HMRC in respect of the FN's and APN's.
We are currently looking to add interested parties into the JR and I should be grateful if you would confirm which of the following is relevant to you:
1. Letters of representation submitted but no response received as yet from HMRC.
2. You have fully settled this matter with HMRC.
3. You have paid the APN's but not completed the corrective action forms."
I'm a number 2 - but am now extremely wary of discussing ANYTHING with Montpelier following their threat and subsequent attempt to charge for the letters of representation. In fact it was the potential for future potentially unlimited charges from Montpelier which prompted me to throw in the towel and settle with HMRC - so I never used their letter of representation anyway. I don't know whether to reply and tell them I've settled or just ignore them. Any thoughts anyone?Comment
-
Originally posted by justadadnow View PostHas anyone else had this or similar email from Montpelier:
"Upon checking our records, I note that you have not advised if a response has been received to the letters of representation submitted to HMRC in respect of the FN's and APN's.
We are currently looking to add interested parties into the JR and I should be grateful if you would confirm which of the following is relevant to you:
1. Letters of representation submitted but no response received as yet from HMRC.
2. You have fully settled this matter with HMRC.
3. You have paid the APN's but not completed the corrective action forms."
I'm a number 2 - but am now extremely wary of discussing ANYTHING with Montpelier following their threat and subsequent attempt to charge for the letters of representation. In fact it was the potential for future potentially unlimited charges from Montpelier which prompted me to throw in the towel and settle with HMRC - so I never used their letter of representation anyway. I don't know whether to reply and tell them I've settled or just ignore them. Any thoughts anyone?Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Streamline Your Retirement with iSIPP: A Solution for Contractor Pensions Sep 1 09:13
- Making the most of pension lump sums: overview for contractors Sep 1 08:36
- Umbrella company tribunal cases are opening up; are your wages subject to unlawful deductions, too? Aug 31 08:38
- Contractors, relabelling 'labour' as 'services' to appear 'fully contracted out' won't dupe IR35 inspectors Aug 31 08:30
- How often does HMRC check tax returns? Aug 30 08:27
- Work-life balance as an IT contractor: 5 top tips from a tech recruiter Aug 30 08:20
- Autumn Statement 2023 tipped to prioritise mental health, in a boost for UK workplaces Aug 29 08:33
- Final reminder for contractors to respond to the umbrella consultation (closing today) Aug 29 08:09
- Top 5 most in demand cyber security contract roles Aug 25 08:38
- Changes to the right to request flexible working are incoming, but how will contractors be affected? Aug 24 08:25
Comment