Originally posted by More Lamb
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Tribunal and beyond
Collapse
X
-
Scoots still says that Apr 2020 didn't mark the start of a new stock bull market. -
Originally posted by BolshieBastard View PostBig Group have absolutely nothing to do with the Montpelier DTA nor the FTT.
Neither is there any indication when the judgement will be delivered so please do not listen to uninformed posters such as More Lamb.
The Montpelier DTA case that went to FTT and is not the Huitson case, was at Tribunal in May 2019 and as mentionad, a decision is awaited. WTT/Big Group had nothing to do with that action in terms of organising or supporting it.
(As it happens we are now involved in it and think it quite outrageous that a decision has not been reached. We are told it may yet be more months before it appears).
The cases we are involved in taking to the FTT are a mix of those where HMRC is making the running and those where we are.
Very much though dealing with the FTT.Best Forum Adviser & Forum Personality of the Year 2018.
(No, me neither).Comment
-
Originally posted by webberg View Post(As it happens we are now involved in it and think it quite outrageous that a decision has not been reached. We are told it may yet be more months before it appears).
Try 4 years for size. (46 months to be precise)
That's the length of time it took, from applying to the FTT in July 2015, for the case to actually come to tribunal. Now that's proper outrageous!
Can anyone guess why it took this long? <mod snip>Comment
-
Originally posted by webberg View PostTo clarify.
The Montpelier DTA case that went to FTT and is not the Huitson case, was at Tribunal in May 2019 and as mentionad, a decision is awaited. WTT/Big Group had nothing to do with that action in terms of organising or supporting it.
(As it happens we are now involved in it and think it quite outrageous that a decision has not been reached. We are told it may yet be more months before it appears).
The cases we are involved in taking to the FTT are a mix of those where HMRC is making the running and those where we are.
Very much though dealing with the FTT.
Just to clarify this comment here, webberg's group are NOT involved with the May 2019 (Montpelier DTA) FTT at all. The statement 'as it happens, we are now involved in it,' is just downright misleading.
A number of people have sought to combat HMRC's APN regime. However, by luck or design, HMRC has managed to get a couple of other cases heard and decided before the 'Montpelier DTA' action. This means at least one case is progressing to appeal via the UTT and it needs to be remembered that UTT decisions set precedence while FTTs do not.
The organisers of the 'Montpelier DTA' decided it was prudent to reach out to these other groups to not only share some relevant info but to also determine these other groups timetable and strategies.
But it is incorrect to say that any other group is now 'involved' in any way with another group's action. No other group drives the others actions and no other group speaks for members of another group.
Please remember this when you read comments in these threads.I couldn't give two fornicators! Yes, really!Comment
-
why are we discussing this on an open forum ?
really would urge people not to discuss this on an open forum as its just unhelpful
closed forums are available with BG and others for those parties interested in the case.Comment
-
Originally posted by CanPayButWouldRatherNot View Postreally would urge people not to discuss this on an open forum as its just unhelpful
closed forums are available with BG and others for those parties interested in the case.Comment
-
-
Comment
-
Originally posted by lowpaidworker View PostAnyone know what the Judges decision was for the LCAG JR. Or has it not been published yet ?
I supported the JR but have always seen it as a long shot and a way to apply pressure/buy time rather than anything else.Comment
-
Originally posted by dammit chloe View PostPublished next week. Quite quick so I don't see it being favourable. It will be appealed no doubt. Be interesting if there are any morsels to feed off.
I supported the JR but have always seen it as a long shot and a way to apply pressure/buy time rather than anything else.Scoots still says that Apr 2020 didn't mark the start of a new stock bull market.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Streamline Your Retirement with iSIPP: A Solution for Contractor Pensions Sep 1 09:13
- Making the most of pension lump sums: overview for contractors Sep 1 08:36
- Umbrella company tribunal cases are opening up; are your wages subject to unlawful deductions, too? Aug 31 08:38
- Contractors, relabelling 'labour' as 'services' to appear 'fully contracted out' won't dupe IR35 inspectors Aug 31 08:30
- How often does HMRC check tax returns? Aug 30 08:27
- Work-life balance as an IT contractor: 5 top tips from a tech recruiter Aug 30 08:20
- Autumn Statement 2023 tipped to prioritise mental health, in a boost for UK workplaces Aug 29 08:33
- Final reminder for contractors to respond to the umbrella consultation (closing today) Aug 29 08:09
- Top 5 most in demand cyber security contract roles Aug 25 08:38
- Changes to the right to request flexible working are incoming, but how will contractors be affected? Aug 24 08:25
Comment