I don't know if HMRC regard the LC as a PoA but webberg has mentioned it a few times, and I'm not disagreeing.
If it is like a PoA, then what's wrong with paying it (instead of settling) if it costs less? (Now that you can spread the LC over 3 years it might work out cheaper than settling for many more people.)
Sure, you may have to hand over more at some point in the future, but so long as people understand this, what's wrong with going down this route?
Why, as has been alluded to on several occasions, is this a bad idea?
If it is like a PoA, then what's wrong with paying it (instead of settling) if it costs less? (Now that you can spread the LC over 3 years it might work out cheaper than settling for many more people.)
Sure, you may have to hand over more at some point in the future, but so long as people understand this, what's wrong with going down this route?
Why, as has been alluded to on several occasions, is this a bad idea?
Comment