Originally posted by lowpaidworker
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Track the Finance Bill 2020-21 here
Collapse
X
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by dangermaus View PostThis part is certainly interesting...
Avoidance schemes
Taxpayers may attempt to use an avoidance scheme in order to reduce their tax bills. Sometimes you will need to consider avoidance schemes that fail.
For example a taxpayer may enter into an avoidance scheme after being shown written opinion of Leading Counsel, which says unequivocally that the scheme is legally correct. If the scheme is ultimately defeated you may find it difficult to show any negligence. You must however still consider the penalty position in the same way as you would for any other inaccuracy.
Does that effectively cover the user of a scheme from being penalised for "evasion"?
"Taxpayers may use an avoidance scheme" my emphasis - and "penalised for evasion" -my emphasis.
Not the same and the tests for penalties are different.
Avoidance is legal. It may not work and a Judge may decide that it was a sham or that users were unaware of some aspects of the structure, but still, legal.
If you do something that is legal and you take reasonable care in doing so, such as being shown AND READING a QC opinion, then penalties based on unreasonableness are almost impossible to apply. (HMRC will still try but in our experience will back down if you maintain your position of having done nothing illegal).
Evasion is criminal. Here HMRC will almost certainly never back away from penalties.
I would also say that the position proposed by Mr Bloggs is not one I would agree with. I do not see anything in an HMRC manual that would aid a case against a QC. (I have only ever seen one QC actually sued for an "opinion" and that was not a tax transaction.)Best Forum Adviser & Forum Personality of the Year 2018.
(No, me neither).Comment
-
Originally posted by webberg View PostIf you do something that is legal and you take reasonable care in doing so, such as being shown AND READING a QC opinion, then penalties based on unreasonableness are almost impossible to apply. (HMRC will still try but in our experience will back down if you maintain your position of having done nothing illegal).
Bayliss – HMRC Seek Extra Penalties From Failed Avoidance Scheme | Eaves & Co
Unfortunately, it looks like HMRC got legislation passed the following year to counter-act this. As far as I can tell, the legislation is only prospective and doesn't have any retroactive effect.
Errors in taxpayer documents | Tax Adviser
Bottom line: anyone using a scheme today would appear to be in a much weaker position in terms of relying on advice as a "reasonable care" defence against penalties.Last edited by DealorNoDeal; 7 July 2020, 10:17.Scoots still says that Apr 2020 didn't mark the start of a new stock bull market.Comment
-
I should add, anyone using a scheme today needs their head examining.Scoots still says that Apr 2020 didn't mark the start of a new stock bull market.Comment
-
Originally posted by DealorNoDeal View PostI should add, anyone using a scheme today needs their head examining.
thousands.... his words not mine.Comment
-
Originally posted by lowpaidworker View Postand yet the Morse enquiry found out that despite all the HMRC protestations thousands of tax payers are STILL being unwittingly sold, forced into and signing up to these schemes.
thousands.... his words not mine.
For the avoidance of doubt I would not recommend any of them.Best Forum Adviser & Forum Personality of the Year 2018.
(No, me neither).Comment
-
I doubt any scheme is marketed/sold as a "tax avoidance scheme". A lot of them purport to be umbrella companies and use words like "fully compliant" to make it all seem totally above board.
However, as malvolio said in another thread, the ridiculously low tax should be a bit of a clue that this is not normal. I think it's hard to excuse anyone these days for not doing a bit of due diligence.Scoots still says that Apr 2020 didn't mark the start of a new stock bull market.Comment
-
Originally posted by lowpaidworker View Postand yet the Morse enquiry found out that despite all the HMRC protestations thousands of tax payers are STILL being unwittingly sold, forced into and signing up to these schemes.
thousands.... his words not mine.
I know some people are not financially literate, and are easily persuaded by promises of huge returns with no risks, but anyone who signs up for one of these schemes nowadays, when there's a plethora of information telling them to do otherwise, really does deserve HMRC to come knocking.Last edited by Paralytic; 7 July 2020, 16:01.Comment
-
Originally posted by DealorNoDeal View PostI doubt any scheme is marketed/sold as a "tax avoidance scheme". A lot of them purport to be umbrella companies and use words like "fully compliant" to make it all seem totally above board.
However, as malvolio said in another thread, the ridiculously low tax should be a bit of a clue that this is not normal. I think it's hard to excuse anyone these days for not doing a bit of due diligence.Last edited by lowpaidworker; 7 July 2020, 15:12.Comment
-
Originally posted by Paralytic View Post"forced into"?
I know some people are not financially literate, and are easily persuaded by promises of huge returns with no risks, but anyone who sign up for these schemes nowadays, when there's a plethora of information telling them to do otherwise, really does deserve HMRC to come knocking.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Streamline Your Retirement with iSIPP: A Solution for Contractor Pensions Sep 1 09:13
- Making the most of pension lump sums: overview for contractors Sep 1 08:36
- Umbrella company tribunal cases are opening up; are your wages subject to unlawful deductions, too? Aug 31 08:38
- Contractors, relabelling 'labour' as 'services' to appear 'fully contracted out' won't dupe IR35 inspectors Aug 31 08:30
- How often does HMRC check tax returns? Aug 30 08:27
- Work-life balance as an IT contractor: 5 top tips from a tech recruiter Aug 30 08:20
- Autumn Statement 2023 tipped to prioritise mental health, in a boost for UK workplaces Aug 29 08:33
- Final reminder for contractors to respond to the umbrella consultation (closing today) Aug 29 08:09
- Top 5 most in demand cyber security contract roles Aug 25 08:38
- Changes to the right to request flexible working are incoming, but how will contractors be affected? Aug 24 08:25
Comment