Things about to get very serious and much more real? Things about to get very serious and much more real? - Page 36
Page 36 of 44 FirstFirst ... 263435363738 ... LastLast
Posts 351 to 360 of 433
  1. #351

    Still gathering requirements...


    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Posts
    20

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by eek View Post
    If you think about the current game they are playing - Felicitas aim is just to find anyone who hasn't responded to the Demand and then get money from them.

    I think every single step is focussed on gathering some money to allow them to continue to their next step.
    most likely, in my opinion it's suicidal to go against 100s or maybe even more people (mostly IT contractors) in any legal battle, they don't have any idea who they against or how much deeper pockets people would have collectively to fight.

    so they rely on pressure into mediation or settlement.
    Last edited by Contractor UK; 11th January 2021 at 11:22.

  2. #352

    bored now

    eek's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    😂
    Posts
    27,004

    Default

    I would delete that clause information....
    merely at clientco for the entertainment

  3. #353

    Some things in Moderation

    cojak's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Look to your right...
    Posts
    20,954

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by uppoocreek View Post
    Why? No personal info
    Because you have shown them a weakness/leak that they can plug...
    "I can put any old tat in my sig, put quotes around it and attribute to someone of whom I've heard, to make it sound true."
    - Voltaire/Benjamin Franklin/Anne Frank...

  4. #354

    Should post faster


    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Posts
    146

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by cojak View Post
    Because you shown them a weakness/leak that they can plug...
    In any litigation you must put forward your line of defence and attack well in advance of court hearing, so not sure why sharing lines of defence here is such a problem! Others on the forum will benefit and can mitigate their position.

    At some point the individual above needs to put this to the litigator, no secret
    Last edited by luxCon; 26th November 2020 at 10:35. Reason: This and that

  5. #355

    Nervous Newbie


    Join Date
    Nov 2020
    Posts
    2

    Default

    So just heard back for Elysium and Felicitas have dropped the Statutory Demands.

    Will be interesting to see what Felicitas do next.

  6. #356

    Post The SD Tactic - mine now withdrawn

    I also posted this on the iq-contracts-statutory-demand thread.
    -----------------
    I ignored all previous dubious emails and physical correspondence. I also ignored Felicitas thinking they would go the same way as Trust Help Line, DOR Resolutions Limited, Dynamic Partners Consultants Limited to name but a few.
    My belief is these promoters and their agents began to see their windfalls from those who were worn down by repeated threats, begin to dwindle and realised they needed a different tactic to get to people in my 'ignore' category. That's where the Statutory Demand tactic comes into play whereupon they may require rights precisely because the person being targeted may ignore and not respond.
    I'm pleased to see some of these demands are now being withdrawn once challenged. I did not engage support from anyone other than by reading contributions on the Contractor UK forums plus the fact I'd kept all letters, emails, original offers plus contracts and associated documents.
    My advice to anyone still with an outstanding Statutory Demand is to challenge it NOW. It cost me just over £6 to send a letter to Statutory Law Ltd by recorded delivery.
    Last edited by Contractor UK; 11th January 2021 at 11:22.

  7. #357

    Nervous Newbie


    Join Date
    Nov 2020
    Posts
    1

    Default Same boat...

    Quote Originally Posted by Diagnose b4 u prescribe View Post
    I also posted this on the iq-contracts-statutory-demand thread.
    -----------------
    I ignored all previous dubious emails and physical correspondence. I also ignored Felicitas thinking they would go the same way as Trust Help Line, DOR Resolutions Limited, Dynamic Partners Consultants Limited to name but a few.
    My belief is these promoters and their agents began to see their windfalls from those who were worn down by repeated threats, begin to dwindle and realised they needed a different tactic to get to people in my 'ignore' category. That's where the Statutory Demand tactic comes into play whereupon they may require rights precisely because the person being targeted may ignore and not respond.
    I'm pleased to see some of these demands are now being withdrawn once challenged. I did not engage support from anyone other than by reading contributions on the Contractor UK forums plus the fact I'd kept all letters, emails, original offers plus contracts and associated documents.
    My advice to anyone still with an outstanding Statutory Demand is to challenge it NOW. It cost me just over £6 to send a letter to Statutory Law Ltd by recorded delivery.
    Thanks for the post Diagnose b4 u prescribe.

    I am in the same position you have described above. Need to send a challenge to Statutory Law, would i need to also send it to the Court in question? Also any tips for what to send to Statutory Law.
    Last edited by Contractor UK; 11th January 2021 at 11:23.

  8. #358

    Some things in Moderation

    cojak's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Look to your right...
    Posts
    20,954

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by td75 View Post
    Thanks for the post Diagnose b4 u prescribe.

    I am in the same position you have described above. Need to send a challenge to Statutory Law, would i need to also send it to the Court in question? Also any tips for what to send to Statutory Law.
    Read this article and send off form IAA, but I would contact NDL first.

    Fact Sheet - Statutory demands | Set aside a statutory demand | National Debtline
    "I can put any old tat in my sig, put quotes around it and attribute to someone of whom I've heard, to make it sound true."
    - Voltaire/Benjamin Franklin/Anne Frank...

  9. #359

    Still gathering requirements...


    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Posts
    20

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by td75 View Post
    Thanks for the post Diagnose b4 u prescribe.

    I am in the same position you have described above. Need to send a challenge to Statutory Law, would i need to also send it to the Court in question? Also any tips for what to send to Statutory Law.
    You need to challenge the demand ASAP with Statutory Law to have it withdrawn. Don't need to send it to court, because it never progressed to the court yet.

  10. #360

    Still gathering requirements...


    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Posts
    97

    Default

    I keep receiving mails from felicitas, which I never opened.

    How do I know whether I'm on statutory demand?

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •