• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

How do you know if your contract is public sector

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #31
    Originally posted by youngguy View Post
    Is this not clear? Example 3 in the doc showed that a contractor working under a consultancy providing services to ps was caught and the consultancy would collect the taxes .

    It's been a while since I looked at the doc though
    Nothing's ever clear.

    Is the consultancy just "working" for PS client by providing bums on seats integrated with permies at PS client or is the consultancy providing solutions for PS client, for example a computer system for which PS client play no part in development aside from providing requirements?

    Comment


      #32
      Originally posted by perplexed View Post
      Nothing's ever clear.

      Is the consultancy just "working" for PS client by providing bums on seats integrated with permies at PS client or is the consultancy providing solutions for PS client, for example a computer system for which PS client play no part in development aside from providing requirements?
      It's fairly clear all the examples using consultancies scream that people are inside.... the example that doesn't is a fixed price piece of work done remotely...

      Do you want to work for a consultancy which is on a client site on a project that is likely time and materials based.
      merely at clientco for the entertainment

      Comment


        #33
        Originally posted by perplexed View Post
        Nothing's ever clear
        Agreed, but I think psychocandy is a BoS contractor, onsite at a PS client. If so, it's clear that the new rules will apply. If a consultancy is supplying labour, much like an agency, the rules apply. I agree that there is considerable greyness, but not really on this specific issue of consultancies supplying bodies who then receive their instructions from the PS client.

        Comment


          #34
          Originally posted by jamesbrown View Post
          Agreed, but I think psychocandy is a BoS contractor, onsite at a PS client. If so, it's clear that the new rules will apply. If a consultancy is supplying labour, much like an agency, the rules apply. I agree that there is considerable greyness, but not really on this specific issue of consultancies supplying bodies who then receive their instructions from the PS client.
          To be fair from what he heard PC is well inside by the old rules never mind the new ones. Easy pickings if they do come at us retrospectively.
          'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!!

          Comment


            #35
            Originally posted by northernladuk View Post
            To be fair from what he heard PC is well inside by the old rules never mind the new ones. Easy pickings if they do come at us retrospectively.
            I do wonder how many other people IPSE have been giving false comfort to....
            merely at clientco for the entertainment

            Comment


              #36
              Originally posted by eek View Post
              It's fairly clear all the examples using consultancies scream that people are inside.... the example that doesn't is a fixed price piece of work done remotely...

              Do you want to work for a consultancy which is on a client site on a project that is likely time and materials based.
              Likely to be T&M, I'd agree - that relies upon contractor getting that information out from the consultancy, to be 100% accurate.

              It's perfectly valid that a SME/Consultancy can be based inside PS client property, especially where there are restrictions around the accessible data, connectivity of outside devices etc. As long as that work is ringfenced within the consultancy boundary ( ie the difference between "Consultancy X provide PS client with X developers" and "Consultancy X provide PS client with a solution that implements these requirements, to this given timescale with these deliverables" ).

              I'd not want to work any more PS than I've done in the past for reasons other than the April changes tbh...

              Comment

              Working...
              X