Under IR35 - Capita is charging me Apprenticeship Levy Tax Under IR35 - Capita is charging me Apprenticeship Levy Tax
Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast
Posts 1 to 10 of 31
  1. #1

    Nervous Newbie


    Join Date
    May 2017
    Posts
    5

    Default Under IR35 - Capita is charging me Apprenticeship Levy Tax

    I'm a contractor working for a goverment agency and Capita is handling my billing. I've been forced under IR35. Capita is now taking out of my day rate the apprentiship levy tax at .5%. This is only required by companies with a payroll over 3million. My company does not have a payroll of over 3m, So this must be Capitas Tax. Is this even legal to pass on a tax? they say it is a ccs policy that I pay for Capita's tax? I also don't get any of the benefits or rebates.

  2. #2

    Old Greg is my bitch's bitch

    northernladyuk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Working the streets of your imagination
    Posts
    9,419

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by nelsonswork View Post
    I'm a contractor working for a goverment agency and Capita is handling my billing. I've been forced under IR35. Capita is now taking out of my day rate the apprentiship levy tax at .5%. This is only required by companies with a payroll over 3million. My company does not have a payroll of over 3m, So this must be Capitas Tax. Is this even legal to pass on a tax? they say it is a ccs policy that I pay for Capita's tax? I also don't get any of the benefits or rebates.
    What does your contract say?
    Where there's muck there's brass.

  3. #3

    Super poster

    ladymuck's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    London
    Posts
    2,512

    Default

    Capita, as your faux employer, has a turnover that means the levy is chargeable. Whether they pay it, you pay it, or the PSB pays it depends on your contract.

    BTW - your post implies you are putting the invoicing/receipts through your Ltd Co. How are you accounting for the VAT discrepancy between what you charge and what you receive? I asked my accountant and he didn't know!

  4. #4

    bored now

    eek's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    😂
    Posts
    22,766

    Default

    First question who is paying you personally... To answer your question we need to know the contract hierarchy:-

    public sector client -> Capita -> ???? -> ???? (either your company / umbrella) --> you

    only then can we work out what is happening and whether the deduction is valid or not...
    merely at clientco for the entertainment

  5. #5

    I live on CUK

    SueEllen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    in the Park
    Posts
    29,042

    Default

    Why is this thread in General?
    "You’re just a bad memory who doesn’t know when to go away" JR

  6. #6

    bored now

    eek's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    😂
    Posts
    22,766

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ladymuck View Post
    Capita, as your faux employer, has a turnover that means the levy is chargeable. Whether they pay it, you pay it, or the PSB pays it depends on your contract.

    BTW - your post implies you are putting the invoicing/receipts through your Ltd Co. How are you accounting for the VAT discrepancy between what you charge and what you receive? I asked my accountant and he didn't know!
    There is no VAT discrepancy -> you bill £2000 with £400 VAT on top and you receive £400 in VAT.

    The issue is that you don't receive £2000 in payment alongside that £400 in VAT. You only get £1200 of it (rough guesstimate figure) with the rest withhold or paid on your behalf by the agency....
    merely at clientco for the entertainment

  7. #7

    Faqqed Off

    TheFaQQer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    36,490

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by nelsonswork View Post
    Is this even legal to pass on a tax?
    It's legal as long as it is agreed between all parties - they cannot just add an extra charge to you without it being agreed in your contract though.

    One of the schools that I am involved with has had to add a line in the budget this year to account for it, even though "our" payroll bill is significantly less than the £3m turnover. One of the other schools that I am involved with does not because it is being paid for by another entity instead of the individual school. Both are legal because of the contractual arrangements.
    Best Forum Advisor 2014
    Work in the public sector? You can read my FAQ here
    Click here to get 15% off your first year's IPSE membership

  8. #8

    Old Greg is my bitch's bitch

    northernladyuk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Working the streets of your imagination
    Posts
    9,419

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SueEllen View Post
    Why is this thread in General?
    Due to the Chutney Spoon Levy.
    Where there's muck there's brass.

  9. #9

    Super poster

    ladymuck's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    London
    Posts
    2,512

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by eek View Post
    There is no VAT discrepancy -> you bill £2000 with £400 VAT on top and you receive £400 in VAT.

    The issue is that you don't receive £2000 in payment alongside that £400 in VAT. You only get £1200 of it (rough guesstimate figure) with the rest withhold or paid on your behalf by the agency....
    Ah...ok. That makes sense. Thank you

    Time to change accountants.

  10. #10

    My post count is Majestic

    northernladuk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    38,869

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SueEllen View Post
    Why is this thread in General?
    Cause people are lazy.
    'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!!

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •