• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

IR35 Myths

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    Originally posted by Maslins View Post
    Surely a key thing here is MOO and control over when you work. Eg two very different situations:

    1) you work Mon/Tue/Wed for client A, Thu/Fri for client B. This is contractually agreed, and what you always do. Even though you have two clients, potentially with fairly even income, there is still MOO with both, and the clients control when you work.

    2) you have agreements with client A and client B of a daily rate, and they'll call on you as/when they need help. Sometimes neither will want you on a given day. Other days both will want you, and you'll likely choose one. Here there's no MOO, and you control when you work.

    I agree though that there is a myth believed by some that having 1% of their income from little side bits means the 99% of their income from their main client is suddenly immune to IR35. This is of course not true.
    This is what I meant. How many clients will be prepared to play second fiddle? Not many I would think.
    "I can put any old tat in my sig, put quotes around it and attribute to someone of whom I've heard, to make it sound true."
    - Voltaire/Benjamin Franklin/Anne Frank...

    Comment


      #12
      Originally posted by northernladuk View Post
      Being sent home from clients for shut down periods or us going on holidays isn't, as some people think, anything to do with MoO.
      How does this relate to:

      "There will be no requirement for (job role) to work the non-bank holidays between 25th December to 1st Jan. Contractors will be expected to submit timesheets as non-billable for that week. For permanent members of staff it is up to you whether you use your annual leave entitlement or work those days."

      Comment


        #13
        It's the Time and Materials way our contracts work. We work a day, we get paid a day. MoO is about the expectation of work after the assignment you are in is complete, not during.
        'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!!

        Comment


          #14
          Originally posted by northernladuk View Post
          It's the Time and Materials way our contracts work. We work a day, we get paid a day. MoO is about the expectation of work after the assignment you are in is complete, not during.
          yes, apologies. I got caught up in the MoO, and the Control aspect, and am torn between thinking that the mail they sent out clearly shows they class me as a contractor not a permie, but also shows a level of control they have over deciding when I can work.

          Comment


            #15
            Originally posted by Blert596 View Post
            yes, apologies. I got caught up in the MoO, and the Control aspect, and am torn between thinking that the mail they sent out clearly shows they class me as a contractor not a permie, but also shows a level of control they have over deciding when I can work.
            It's not really a control issue. It's quite OK to say they have control over the work offered. What they can't do is control the way you do it.

            Enforced time off is a good indicator though. Save the email and stick it in the defense folder but it's no silver bullet.
            'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!!

            Comment


              #16
              Originally posted by northernladuk View Post
              It's not really a control issue. It's quite OK to say they have control over the work offered. What they can't do is control the way you do it.

              Enforced time off is a good indicator though. Save the email and stick it in the defense folder but it's no silver bullet.
              I am not sure I understand you here, and please forgive me if I haven't.

              The whole point of the legislation is to catch people who could be an employee. If the client can control what days you work, then surely that's an indicator.

              The fact that in the email, the employee was directed to come in on normal working days, and the contractor was not, is merely a contractural issue. It does not itself indicate that person could not be an employee.

              For someone on a day rate, expected to visit the company premises during normal working days unless directed otherwise, demonstrates a level of control. Also, some companies shut down completely over the holiday period, surely this would also be an indicator.

              Scenario A

              Role: Agile Developer
              3 month contract
              Hourly rate, paid weekly
              9-5, Monday to Friday, or as directed by your manager
              Must be on client premises
              Report to development manager

              Scenario B

              Role: Agile Developer
              3 month contract
              Day rate, hours are flexible, paid monthly
              Monday to Friday
              Mostly on client site, some work from home
              Work assigned by scrum master

              Scenario C

              Contract to develop a piece of software
              3 month contract
              Fixed fee for contract, paid on completion
              Work anytime from contractors own business premises
              Present completed software to the client

              Scenario A is almost always going to be inside, B is going to be dubious but mostly caught, C is almost certainly outside.

              Again, forgive me if I am way off here.

              Comment


                #17
                Originally posted by Jolie View Post
                I am not sure I understand you here, and please forgive me if I haven't.

                The whole point of the legislation is to catch people who could be an employee. If the client can control what days you work, then surely that's an indicator.

                The fact that in the email, the employee was directed to come in on normal working days, and the contractor was not, is merely a contractural issue. It does not itself indicate that person could not be an employee.

                For someone on a day rate, expected to visit the company premises during normal working days unless directed otherwise, demonstrates a level of control. Also, some companies shut down completely over the holiday period, surely this would also be an indicator.

                Scenario A

                Role: Agile Developer
                3 month contract
                Hourly rate, paid weekly
                9-5, Monday to Friday, or as directed by your manager
                Must be on client premises
                Report to development manager

                Scenario B

                Role: Agile Developer
                3 month contract
                Day rate, hours are flexible, paid monthly
                Monday to Friday
                Mostly on client site, some work from home
                Work assigned by scrum master

                Scenario C

                Contract to develop a piece of software
                3 month contract
                Fixed fee for contract, paid on completion
                Work anytime from contractors own business premises
                Present completed software to the client

                Scenario A is almost always going to be inside, B is going to be dubious but mostly caught, C is almost certainly outside.

                Again, forgive me if I am way off here.
                Scenarios 3 I don’t think is realistic, there will be requirements, technical standard from client and no doubt progress reporting, demos required etc changes being dictated by client etc etc it’s not to take away the point your making but there will be “control” as such between contract and end software to ensure it’s the product they want to the time they want.
                Control is very grey to me like all of this, I’ve been forced on occasions to be onsite etc (looking like A without the manager bit) but the reality of day to day working is they have no control and don’t want it, you lead/deliver how you want etc.



                Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

                Comment


                  #18
                  Originally posted by TheInvoicer View Post
                  Scenarios 3 I don’t think is realistic, there will be requirements, technical standard from client and no doubt progress reporting, demos required etc changes being dictated by client etc etc
                  Isn't that the whole point? As a business, who is offering to create software, the client tells you what they want, their requirement, the technical standard etc. My client is not a software house, has no business analysts, so I am in theory an analyst programmer. The only time I am on-site is to work with their staff to look at how they work, what the software needs to achieve and how it should be implemented. There is progress reporting every two weeks, via a video call, where demo's are presented, issues and requirements discussed, but the client has no idea how I do my work, the technology I use and has no control day to day how I complete the work. In fact they are not interested in that, they are only interested in that the end result works, is tested thoroughly and enables their staff to work productively.

                  Scenario 3 is what my client is asking me to do after April 6th.

                  Originally posted by TheInvoicer View Post
                  it’s not to take away the point your making but there will be “control” as such between contract and end software to ensure it’s the product they want to the time they want.
                  I wouldn't consider that control. There's an expectation that the client will need to tell you what they want, discuss with you requirements and issues before, during and after the software has been produced. Control is when you are there every day, reporting to someone who is checking on your progress, using their equipment, working to their software standards using technologies they want and the code being checked and verified by them.

                  Originally posted by TheInvoicer View Post
                  Control is very grey to me like all of this, I’ve been forced on occasions to be onsite etc (looking like A without the manager bit) but the reality of day to day working is they have no control and don’t want it, you lead/deliver how you want etc.
                  Exactly, being on-site occasionally is to be expected, the key is you lead/deliver how you want, which is not control. Being expected to give progress, discuss requirements and demo is also not control.

                  Comment


                    #19
                    Originally posted by Jolie View Post
                    I am not sure I understand you here, and please forgive me if I haven't.

                    The whole point of the legislation is to catch people who could be an employee. If the client can control what days you work, then surely that's an indicator.

                    The fact that in the email, the employee was directed to come in on normal working days, and the contractor was not, is merely a contractural issue. It does not itself indicate that person could not be an employee.

                    For someone on a day rate, expected to visit the company premises during normal working days unless directed otherwise, demonstrates a level of control. Also, some companies shut down completely over the holiday period, surely this would also be an indicator.
                    Not really. The full term is Supervision, Direction and Control and the definition is below.

                    Supervision is someone overseeing a person doing work, to ensure that person is doing the work they are required to do and it is being done correctly to the required standard. Supervision can also involve helping the person, where appropriate, in order to develop their skills and knowledge.
                    Direction is someone making a person do is/her work in a certain way by providing them with instructions, guidance or advice as to how the work must be done. Someone providing direction will often coordinate the how the work is done, as it is being undertaken.
                    Control is someone dictating what work a person does and how they go about doing that work. Control also includes someone having the power to move the person from one job to another.
                    You can see none of them particularly mention when. We are a supplier of services to a client on a time and materials basis. When we supply that service is at the whim of the client, how we do is not. You could dictate when a builder comes to start work on your house and when you don't want him there but you can't sit there and tell him how to lay his bricks etc.

                    Often when to work is dictated by the clients working conditions to which we are a slave. Xmas service protection periods or times the site is open will dictate when and has nothing to do with the way we do it.

                    So on the whole being told when you can work is at worst a very minor indicator in the scheme of things.
                    Scenario A

                    Role: Agile Developer
                    3 month contract
                    Hourly rate, paid weekly
                    9-5, Monday to Friday, or as directed by your manager
                    Must be on client premises
                    Report to development manager

                    Scenario B

                    Role: Agile Developer
                    3 month contract
                    Day rate, hours are flexible, paid monthly
                    Monday to Friday
                    Mostly on client site, some work from home
                    Work assigned by scrum master

                    Scenario C

                    Contract to develop a piece of software
                    3 month contract
                    Fixed fee for contract, paid on completion
                    Work anytime from contractors own business premises
                    Present completed software to the client

                    Scenario A is almost always going to be inside, B is going to be dubious but mostly caught, C is almost certainly outside.

                    Again, forgive me if I am way off here.
                    You aren't way off. It's a very simplistic overview though that doesn't give anything like enough information to be able to make determinations. The devil is in the details. You don't mention the 3 pillars plus working conditions and the like. Broadly it's a start, enough information to call the status, no. I don't agree with A as being almost always though.. but it's too generic to start getting in to the details in this thread.
                    'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!!

                    Comment


                      #20
                      Originally posted by Maslins View Post
                      Surely a key thing here is MOO and control over when you work. Eg two very different situations:

                      1) you work Mon/Tue/Wed for client A, Thu/Fri for client B. This is contractually agreed, and what you always do. Even though you have two clients, potentially with fairly even income, there is still MOO with both, and the clients control when you work.

                      2) you have agreements with client A and client B of a daily rate, and they'll call on you as/when they need help. Sometimes neither will want you on a given day. Other days both will want you, and you'll likely choose one. Here there's no MOO, and you control when you work.

                      I agree though that there is a myth believed by some that having 1% of their income from little side bits means the 99% of their income from their main client is suddenly immune to IR35. This is of course not true.
                      If I had two clients and did the majority of my work for one, how much would I have to do for the other to fall outside of the IR35 trap, if indeed there is a proportion that would remove me at all? Also, would this be viewed as time spent working for each company or for invoice value?

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X