• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

What do you honestly think will happen in 2020?

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #21
    Originally posted by CryingSheep View Post
    My experience has always been in big banks.

    I agree it would be hard to agree a substitute, but this would be due to reasonable reasons, I believe, not being enough to define someone as inside IR35 on its own.
    I didn't say it was, but it's part of it.

    Originally posted by CryingSheep View Post
    On the other hand, it happens to me before having a 6 months contract and after 4 months the project was over and my contract was terminated! How this wouldn't clearly put me outside IR35!?
    Hahah wtf?

    Originally posted by CryingSheep View Post
    Working practices are exactly the same as permies!? In which sense!? In my time there, never had to attend a team meeting, 1-2-1s, or any other permie calls/training/activities/bs...
    In the banks I have worked with, it's often impossible to tell who is a contractor and who is permie. For example, they have their own desk in the office, their own parking space, they use the client's equipment, when they go on holiday they ask their 'line manager' to approve it, if they're sick they call it in, they're generally expected to work a set number of hours over a five day week, etc.

    Originally posted by CryingSheep View Post
    I'm not saying I haven't seen many contractors doing BAU and clearly doing permie work, but wouldn't say it was the majority, so not sure why you're generalising based on your probably very specific experience...
    Yes, I'm basing it on my experience of the banks I have worked with (and other large corporates btw), along with what I know from other contractors who have worked with the banks I haven't.
    If you don't have anything nice to say, say it sarcastically

    Comment


      #22
      Originally posted by KinooOrKinog View Post
      I didn't say it was, but it's part of it.

      Hahah wtf?

      In the banks I have worked with, it's often impossible to tell who is a contractor and who is permie. For example, they have their own desk in the office, their own parking space, they use the client's equipment, when they go on holiday they ask their 'line manager' to approve it, if they're sick they call it in, they're generally expected to work a set number of hours over a five day week, etc.

      Yes, I'm basing it on my experience of the banks I have worked with (and other large corporates btw), along with what I know from other contractors who have worked with the banks I haven't.
      When there is no more work a Permie still stick around or is moved to something else, if a contractor contract is terminated because there is no more work on the project that he was assigned to, how you don't get it this clearly separates a contractor from how a permie is treated!?

      Own desks, where I've worked is very very rare (if not non existent). Usually we use hot desks or a few desks reserved for current project team that are usually shared by 2 or 3 contractors each (rotating with wfh). Parking space, is this a joke!? Maybe your 'big' banks were located in the middle of nowhere and there are more parking spaces than employees and in that case don't see why one cannot be used by a contractor! Everywhere I worked there wasn't enough parking for 99% of Permies, leave it alone for Contractors

      Using client material happened to me 50/50 but again for reasonable security reasons.

      Asking the PROJECT MANAGER to approve holidays, letting them know you're off sick or stick (more or less) to a core business timetable, any of those aren't reason enough to put someone inside, so I'm still struggling to understand your point!
      "The boy who cried Sheep"

      Comment


        #23
        Originally posted by CryingSheep View Post
        When there is no more work a Permie still stick around or is moved to something else, if a contractor contract is terminated because there is no more work on the project that he was assigned to, how you don't get it this clearly separates a contractor from how a permie is treated!?

        Own desks, where I've worked is very very rare (if not non existent). Usually we use hot desks or a few desks reserved for current project team that are usually shared by 2 or 3 contractors each (rotating with wfh). Parking space, is this a joke!? Maybe your 'big' banks were located in the middle of nowhere and there are more parking spaces than employees and in that case don't see why one cannot be used by a contractor! Everywhere I worked there wasn't enough parking for 99% of Permies, leave it alone for Contractors

        Using client material happened to me 50/50 but again for reasonable security reasons.

        Asking the PROJECT MANAGER to approve holidays, letting them know you're off sick or stick (more or less) to a core business timetable, any of those aren't reason enough to put someone inside, so I'm still struggling to understand your point!
        Asking the PROJECT MANAGER to approve holidays, letting them know you're off sick or stick (more or less) to a core business timetable, any of those aren't reason enough to put someone inside
        We all know that a court of law, either the 1TT or the ET, should/would take into account all the aspects of an engagement and look at the overall picture before giving a judgement. However, HMRC always cherry pick the aspects of a engagement that supports their contentions. I would say that these aspects of "control" would be seized on by HMRC if they were trying to prove that a contract was subject to the IR35 rules.

        Comment


          #24
          Originally posted by JohntheBike View Post
          We all know that a court of law, either the 1TT or the ET, should/would take into account all the aspects of an engagement and look at the overall picture before giving a judgement. However, HMRC always cherry pick the aspects of a engagement that supports their contentions. I would say that these aspects of "control" would be seized on by HMRC if they were trying to prove that a contract was subject to the IR35 rules.
          And here we go again.....
          'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!!

          Comment


            #25
            Originally posted by CryingSheep View Post
            When there is no more work a Permie still stick around or is moved to something else, if a contractor contract is terminated because there is no more work on the project that he was assigned to, how you don't get it this clearly separates a contractor from how a permie is treated!?

            Own desks, where I've worked is very very rare (if not non existent). Usually we use hot desks or a few desks reserved for current project team that are usually shared by 2 or 3 contractors each (rotating with wfh). Parking space, is this a joke!? Maybe your 'big' banks were located in the middle of nowhere and there are more parking spaces than employees and in that case don't see why one cannot be used by a contractor! Everywhere I worked there wasn't enough parking for 99% of Permies, leave it alone for Contractors

            Using client material happened to me 50/50 but again for reasonable security reasons.

            Asking the PROJECT MANAGER to approve holidays, letting them know you're off sick or stick (more or less) to a core business timetable, any of those aren't reason enough to put someone inside, so I'm still struggling to understand your point!
            Right ok. My original point was that based on personal experience of working practices & that of other contractors I know, a large majority of contractors working with banks (& other large corporates) should be inside IR35.

            I don't know why you're being so argumentative in terms of trying to defend your personal situation but know this; I. Don't. Care.

            Don't @ me.
            If you don't have anything nice to say, say it sarcastically

            Comment


              #26
              Originally posted by northernladuk View Post
              And here we go again.....
              and again.

              and again.

              rinse and repeat.

              Comment


                #27
                Originally posted by KinooOrKinog View Post
                Right ok. My original point was that based on personal experience of working practices & that of other contractors I know, a large majority of contractors working with banks (& other large corporates) should be inside IR35.

                I don't know why you're being so argumentative in terms of trying to defend your personal situation but know this; I. Don't. Care.

                Don't @ me.
                I'm not argumenting or generalising using my personal experience... you are!

                I accept some contractors working for big banks will definitely be inside, but not the majority nor I can see a relation between being more likely to be inside because you're contracting with a big bank! That's all...
                "The boy who cried Sheep"

                Comment


                  #28
                  Going back to the original post, I reassure myself by thinking the amoun tof work is not going to change, so there will still be work available, whether thats outside/inside or perm still has to be seen. If all the contractors tie themselves into permanent work ther emay even be less competition for the temporary work (notice I didnt call it contracts)

                  Comment


                    #29
                    Originally posted by JoJoGabor View Post
                    Going back to the original post, I reassure myself by thinking the amoun tof work is not going to change, so there will still be work available, whether thats outside/inside or perm still has to be seen. If all the contractors tie themselves into permanent work ther emay even be less competition for the temporary work (notice I didnt call it contracts)
                    Yep, I'm loathe to call everyone contractors after April.
                    "I can put any old tat in my sig, put quotes around it and attribute to someone of whom I've heard, to make it sound true."
                    - Voltaire/Benjamin Franklin/Anne Frank...

                    Comment


                      #30
                      Originally posted by cojak View Post
                      Yep, I'm loathe to call everyone contractors after April.
                      what about freelance workers then?

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X