I'm contracted until end March determining myself outside. I intend to give notice on this contract in Feb, assuring I am paid Pre April 6th.
There is talk of me & others being given a determination by the end Cli by the end Jan. I find this puzzling. It's not their determination until AFTER my contract end so why are they doing it? If I get an "inside" - does this reflect badly? Or can I treat it for what it is, an ill informed decision by people who have never met or worked with me to mitigate their risk.
On another subject, it may be that the current cli. wants to offer a new contract going forward. if this were offered inside, am I correct in thinking that this would rise the risk of retrospective investigation, regardless of how ill-informed the decision? Why is it that more weight on a determination is given to a bunch of permie corporates in some HR department somewhere, than to myself?
My current thinking is.
Notice in Feb. Sit it out for a bit and see what occurs in the market.
If offered a new contract, if inside even if all £'s equal @ same client, reject due to risk of retrospective.
If offered a new contract, if outside & ts&cs good, go for it.
Be grateful for any (constructive) comments or pointers to holes in my logic.
There is talk of me & others being given a determination by the end Cli by the end Jan. I find this puzzling. It's not their determination until AFTER my contract end so why are they doing it? If I get an "inside" - does this reflect badly? Or can I treat it for what it is, an ill informed decision by people who have never met or worked with me to mitigate their risk.
On another subject, it may be that the current cli. wants to offer a new contract going forward. if this were offered inside, am I correct in thinking that this would rise the risk of retrospective investigation, regardless of how ill-informed the decision? Why is it that more weight on a determination is given to a bunch of permie corporates in some HR department somewhere, than to myself?
My current thinking is.
Notice in Feb. Sit it out for a bit and see what occurs in the market.
If offered a new contract, if inside even if all £'s equal @ same client, reject due to risk of retrospective.
If offered a new contract, if outside & ts&cs good, go for it.
Be grateful for any (constructive) comments or pointers to holes in my logic.
Comment