I'll be there on Wednesday. If you can go, why on Earth wouldn't you?
I'll be there on Wednesday. If you can go, why on Earth wouldn't you?
...my quagmire of greed....my cesspit of laziness and unfairness....all I am doing is sticking two fingers up at nurses, doctors and other hard working employed professionals...
Still gathering requirements...
Super poster
In that case, you haven't been paying attention. I said it here, and you commented right after that.
I'm of the view it violates the ECHR 6.1. Perhaps someone like IPSE could challenge it on that basis, if they aren't too busy pointlessly lobbying someone or other.
Super poster
No. The law gives clients strong incentives to implement it in exactly the way that they have.
Declare people outside? Potential tax liability.
Declare people inside? Potential employment tribunal liability.
Stop hiring PSCs? No potential liability. Just harder, at least for a while, to get projects done, until contractors get hungry and are willing to go umbrella or FTC.
In almost every case, the third option will be more appealing to clients.
Contractor Among Contractors
Contractor Among Contractors
agreed.Declare people outside? Potential tax liability.
agreedDeclare people inside? Potential employment tribunal liability.
agreed, and even I didn't see that coming!Stop hiring PSCs? No potential liability.
it will be interesting though how HMRC will defend their assertion that genuinely self employed contractors will not be affected by the change in regulations. Clearly, clients have already demonstrated that this is not the case. However, HMRC are so intransigent, that they will stick their heads in the sand and ignore all contrary evidence or lie about the situation. How interested MP's are taking what Jesse dishes out without seriously challenging him, beggars belief.
I really can't see that option 3 will change much, unless there are severe repercussions in the market place, or there is some clever challenge to that position.