• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Ska???

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Ska???

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/6907018.stm

    Has he finaly finished it?
    Science isn't about why, it's about why not. You ask: why is so much of our science dangerous? I say: why not marry safe science if you love it so much. In fact, why not invent a special safety door that won't hit you in the butt on the way out, because you are fired. - Cave Johnson

    #2
    On second thoughts he must be working on this one:

    Researchers are now hoping to move on to even bigger problems. However, it seems that grand master of the board games - chess - may remain unsolved for some time.

    It has somewhere in the range of a billion billion billion billion billion possible positions, meaning that computers, with their current capacity, would takes aeons to solve it.
    Science isn't about why, it's about why not. You ask: why is so much of our science dangerous? I say: why not marry safe science if you love it so much. In fact, why not invent a special safety door that won't hit you in the butt on the way out, because you are fired. - Cave Johnson

    Comment


      #3
      Originally posted by gingerjedi
      On second thoughts he must be working on this one:

      Researchers are now hoping to move on to even bigger problems. However, it seems that grand master of the board games - chess - may remain unsolved for some time.

      It has somewhere in the range of a billion billion billion billion billion possible positions, meaning that computers, with their current capacity, would takes aeons to solve it.
      I've heard it said of a game of chess of average length, that there are more permutations than atoms in the universe.

      Comment


        #4
        Originally posted by gingerjedi
        would takes aeons [/I]
        Reminds me of a great definition of eternity I once read:

        'Imagine a steel sphere as large as the Earth itself, and once every 1,000 years a fly lands on its surface and takes off again. When the sphere has completely worn away from the friction of this action, eternity will not have even begun.'
        It's about time I changed this sig...

        Comment


          #5
          Originally posted by Old Greg
          I've heard it said of a game of chess of average length, that there are more permutations than atoms in the universe.
          I've heard that before and googled to find these approximate figures:

          Number of atoms in the universe 10 to the power of 79

          Number of possible chess moves 10 to the power of 126

          So quite a few more then.
          Science isn't about why, it's about why not. You ask: why is so much of our science dangerous? I say: why not marry safe science if you love it so much. In fact, why not invent a special safety door that won't hit you in the butt on the way out, because you are fired. - Cave Johnson

          Comment


            #6
            At such times a when people quote number like that, I am always reminded of this: YouTube
            Drivel is my speciality

            Comment

            Working...
            X