I've put a more detailed note into this thread but no I did not contact the court because the SD had not been shared with them. Reply to 'Nigel' quickly to ensure they don't use non-engagement as a...
Type: Posts; User: Diagnose b4 u prescribe
I've put a more detailed note into this thread...
I've put a more detailed note into this thread but no I did not contact the court because the SD had not been shared with them. Reply to 'Nigel' quickly to ensure they don't use non-engagement as a...
My experience with SD
I can only speak from personal experience but I believe the Statutory Demand must be delivered physically i.e. via post AND mine did not come from Felicitas but from Statutory Law Ltd aka Nigel...
The SD Tactic - mine now withdrawn
I also posted this on the iq-contracts-statutory-demand thread.
-----------------
I ignored all previous dubious emails and physical correspondence. I also ignored Felicitas thinking they would go...
I was in the category of 'ignore until they go away'
I admit I ignored all previous dubious emails and physical correspondence. I also ignored Felicitas thinking they would go the same way as Trust Help Line, DOR Resolutions Limited, Dynamic Partners...
My SD withdrawn too
But I did draft a detailed response before it was withdrawn. Big thanks to other posts on this forum and especially the number of links posted by EEK, really helpful to know I was not alone. It...
