Wouldn't know they won't work with us
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Umbrella Companies
Collapse
X
-
-
I’ve vetted them (at least they aren’t promising anything dodgy) so provided they engage as professionally as you do Lucy they are welcome."I can put any old tat in my sig, put quotes around it and attribute to someone of whom I've heard, to make it sound true."
- Voltaire/Benjamin Franklin/Anne Frank...Comment
-
-
Originally posted by pdbr View PostHi everyone,
Sorry, It's a bit lengthy.
But...
I'm currently doing some contract work and am looking in to the options that Umbrella Cos provide.
I have some background in payroll and finance so i know that certain schemes run by certain umbrellas should be avoided.
This said, I have been recommended two umbrella cos, Target Umbrella and Maxipay.
if anyone has worked with these companies before, feel free to correct me if i'm wrong but...
Target seem to operate a loan scheme. Where the loans are ultimately never repaid.
Maxipay seem to rely on a clause in their contract that shifts the responsibilities of the "fee payer" away from them and on to my own Ltd Company. Meaning that my Ltd Co would receive 95% of my rate (5% being Maxipay's fee) and my Ltd Co would be responsible for Tax and NI deductions.
I believe that neither scheme would hold up and both would leave me at risk if/when the HMRC came knocking.
My Questions:
Am i being overly paranoid here? I know a lot of people working with both of these companies, so am i missing something with these schemes? are they actually OK?
and if these schemes aren't ok...
Why are big agencies like Hays and Reed allowing their contractors to use these Umbrella Companies? especially since they can also be found liable for any unpaid PAYE & NI if investigated?
Surely the agencies should be trying to avoid putting themselves and their contractors at risk and not, as it seems, encouraging it?
Any thought and opinions would be appreciated.
Thank you.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Streamline Your Retirement with iSIPP: A Solution for Contractor Pensions Sep 1 09:13
- Making the most of pension lump sums: overview for contractors Sep 1 08:36
- Umbrella company tribunal cases are opening up; are your wages subject to unlawful deductions, too? Aug 31 08:38
- Contractors, relabelling 'labour' as 'services' to appear 'fully contracted out' won't dupe IR35 inspectors Aug 31 08:30
- How often does HMRC check tax returns? Aug 30 08:27
- Work-life balance as an IT contractor: 5 top tips from a tech recruiter Aug 30 08:20
- Autumn Statement 2023 tipped to prioritise mental health, in a boost for UK workplaces Aug 29 08:33
- Final reminder for contractors to respond to the umbrella consultation (closing today) Aug 29 08:09
- Top 5 most in demand cyber security contract roles Aug 25 08:38
- Changes to the right to request flexible working are incoming, but how will contractors be affected? Aug 24 08:25
Comment