Im indecisive sometimes, today being one of those times.
In the enviable position of having two contract offers, would appreciate some views, considerations about which you may choose and why, what would sway your opinion.
Agents margins play no part, both as far as im aware are minimum/fixed
Locations no bearing, both same distance from home and accommodation costs
Contract 1 - 6 months (extensions unlikely), higher rate approx. £65pd (higher end of my rate scale)
Small unknown financial company in a niche area for which I have a experience, hence demand driving rate negotiation & counter offers
Easy contract, small project & well within comfort zone & overall accountability
Friendly, less stress?
Contract 2 - 5 months (extensions likely), lower rate by approx. £65pd (low end of my rate scale)
Large well known financial company, large programme, potential for extension 9, 12, 18? months
More challenging role in unfamiliar area, opportunities to polish project and senior stakeholder skills
Probably more stress?
The choice im struggling with is whether you chase the money or play the longer game, new challenges, improved skills and client. Contract 2 was my clear choice but the counter offer and rate differential has made me re-think.
My heart says Contract 2 and money isnt everything, but my head keeps thinking about 'losing' x per day/month - over 6-9 months? it could be £10k gross. That said should contract 2 continue long term the differential is wiped out having avoided a break between contracts.
Im so indecisive today ive even put together a weighted list of positives and negatives for both and still they come out pretty even
Someone suggested I come across as a 'bell end' on a thread the other day, no doubt at all now that I am
Please feel free to flame but would appreciate some embers of advice or opinions re my decision.
Cheers
In the enviable position of having two contract offers, would appreciate some views, considerations about which you may choose and why, what would sway your opinion.
Agents margins play no part, both as far as im aware are minimum/fixed
Locations no bearing, both same distance from home and accommodation costs
Contract 1 - 6 months (extensions unlikely), higher rate approx. £65pd (higher end of my rate scale)
Small unknown financial company in a niche area for which I have a experience, hence demand driving rate negotiation & counter offers
Easy contract, small project & well within comfort zone & overall accountability
Friendly, less stress?
Contract 2 - 5 months (extensions likely), lower rate by approx. £65pd (low end of my rate scale)
Large well known financial company, large programme, potential for extension 9, 12, 18? months
More challenging role in unfamiliar area, opportunities to polish project and senior stakeholder skills
Probably more stress?
The choice im struggling with is whether you chase the money or play the longer game, new challenges, improved skills and client. Contract 2 was my clear choice but the counter offer and rate differential has made me re-think.
My heart says Contract 2 and money isnt everything, but my head keeps thinking about 'losing' x per day/month - over 6-9 months? it could be £10k gross. That said should contract 2 continue long term the differential is wiped out having avoided a break between contracts.
Im so indecisive today ive even put together a weighted list of positives and negatives for both and still they come out pretty even
Someone suggested I come across as a 'bell end' on a thread the other day, no doubt at all now that I am
Please feel free to flame but would appreciate some embers of advice or opinions re my decision.
Cheers
Comment