• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Sharp increase in taxpayers taking 'aggressive' HMRC to judicial review

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Sharp increase in taxpayers taking 'aggressive' HMRC to judicial review

    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/tax/retu...dicial-review/

    And a repeat of earlier article: -
    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/tax/self...ental-illness/

    Mods : not sure if this is the right forum so feel free to move.

    #2
    "Adam Craggs, of RPC, said the organisation was under political pressure to increase tax revenues, and this had prompted HMRC’s new approach."

    Perhaps they should go after those people paying no tax whatsoever and currently under the rader? Just target a row of shops on any high street and review them.
    The greatest trick the devil ever pulled was convincing the world that he didn't exist

    Comment


      #3
      Originally posted by LondonManc View Post
      "Adam Craggs, of RPC, said the organisation was under political pressure to increase tax revenues, and this had prompted HMRC’s new approach."

      Perhaps they should go after those people paying no tax whatsoever and currently under the rader? Just target a row of shops on any high street and review them.
      +1

      And low rates of tax? Several multi-national companies pay very little.

      Non-doms too?

      Comment


        #4
        Originally posted by GreenMirror View Post
        +1

        And low rates of tax? Several multi-national companies pay very little.

        Non-doms too?
        While you shouldn't have to, you tend to have to be careful hammering big corps for tax in case they foxtrot oscar. If they employ 10,000 staff and engage 2,000 contractors over here, that's a lot of tax into the coffers and 12,000 people not claiming JSA.
        The greatest trick the devil ever pulled was convincing the world that he didn't exist

        Comment


          #5
          Originally posted by LondonManc View Post
          While you shouldn't have to, you tend to have to be careful hammering big corps for tax in case they foxtrot oscar. If they employ 10,000 staff and engage 2,000 contractors over here, that's a lot of tax into the coffers and 12,000 people not claiming JSA.
          If, for example, Starbucks decide to leave, there will be coffee shops who pay their taxes.

          Not quite the same as Microsoft. Who might decide to leave anyway due to B*****t.

          Though straying off-topic here. HMRC are getting more aggressive. This will affect all of us.

          Comment

          Working...
          X