I didnt know where to post this.
From the CUK news page: http://www.contractoruk.com/news/003739.html
He seems to think that we have a choice when it comes to using agents.
(I know some go direct, but the majority use agents).
What annoys me, time and again, is generations of MPs legislating based on a snap shot view instead of becoming familiar with the whole story and the historical reasons behind it. NL have been spectacular in their tunnel vision.
If they took an interest in their subject we may never have had such farces as IR35, S660 and The Conduct of Employment Agents act.
Most on here know the history, why dont they?
From the CUK news page: http://www.contractoruk.com/news/003739.html
As it didn’t, Andrew Miller MP, who drew up the plan, said he is wording a definition to exempt professional service providers, like IT contractors, who use agencies from equal treatment.
When he was drafting the Temporary and Agency Workers Bill, the MP said he was “conscious” that he did not want to include providers of professional services who chose to work via agencies.
(I know some go direct, but the majority use agents).
What annoys me, time and again, is generations of MPs legislating based on a snap shot view instead of becoming familiar with the whole story and the historical reasons behind it. NL have been spectacular in their tunnel vision.
If they took an interest in their subject we may never have had such farces as IR35, S660 and The Conduct of Employment Agents act.
Most on here know the history, why dont they?
Comment