According to the guilt ridden liberals on this site the killing of children by Israeli troops whilst "defending themselves" is morally on the same level as suicide bombers who walk on to a bus with the deliberate intention of killing civilians, that include children. Fine
Therefore, correct me if I am wrong, the US and UK troops who invaded Iraq and "accidentally" killed children during the course of their invasion are equally guilty as terrorist suicide bombers who have been killing Iraqi civilians (including children) on a day to day basis.
Saddam of course is no worse than coalition troops or their leaders because in killing 5000 kurdish men women and children horribly with mustard gas, he was only killing people, just as the Americans and British are.
So let us take this moral equivalence "argument" to its logical conclusion, which is to remove the concept of "intent" away from the equation (which in law would manifest itself by categorising manslaughter and murder as the same).
So according to the twisted logic of our left wing guilt merchants the killing of 6 million Jews by Hitler using all means on in particular women and children, was no better or no worse than the British/allied bombing of German cities during the second world war?
The problem with guilt is that it is entirely destructive, not because people get on and deal with it themselves, but because they impose it upon everyone else, even if it means destroying others. Take the UK for example. Our liberals feel so guilty that in order not to offend those who we feel sorry for (in other words patronise) we break down all the things that made us feel good about ourselves, all the things that have happened to create the wonderful country that we have.
We change our laws to accommodate unreasonable behaviour from others
We allow others to be racist but not our own race.
We change our language (no more chairmen, just "chairs")
We remove words like "terror" from our language
We ban foxhunting yet we allow others to kill animals in inhumane ways for personal pleasure.
We play down our history.
We denigrate our own religion and culture
We sneer at the rich whilst handing out free money to feckless chavs
We have rich pop stars who make everyone else give money to Africa when they themselves have millions that they would not dream of giving away.
We have the same pop stars courted by politicians and given knighthoods without any care or concern as to what happens to the money that we give.
We pour scorn on the richest country in the world
and we sneer cynically on Israel.
The reason that these immigrants come here? it is because they want to be part of our society and enjoy Britain for what it is. They do not want to hear this patronising self loathing bulltulip. They want to feel that they are part of a strong confident and proud nation. If the liberals didnt spend their lives undoing alll the things that makde the UK "Great" (and no spod I have not just returned from the pub) then the mosques would have Union Jacks flying out of them (as the stars and stripes do in mosques in the USA)
Therefore, correct me if I am wrong, the US and UK troops who invaded Iraq and "accidentally" killed children during the course of their invasion are equally guilty as terrorist suicide bombers who have been killing Iraqi civilians (including children) on a day to day basis.
Saddam of course is no worse than coalition troops or their leaders because in killing 5000 kurdish men women and children horribly with mustard gas, he was only killing people, just as the Americans and British are.
So let us take this moral equivalence "argument" to its logical conclusion, which is to remove the concept of "intent" away from the equation (which in law would manifest itself by categorising manslaughter and murder as the same).
So according to the twisted logic of our left wing guilt merchants the killing of 6 million Jews by Hitler using all means on in particular women and children, was no better or no worse than the British/allied bombing of German cities during the second world war?
The problem with guilt is that it is entirely destructive, not because people get on and deal with it themselves, but because they impose it upon everyone else, even if it means destroying others. Take the UK for example. Our liberals feel so guilty that in order not to offend those who we feel sorry for (in other words patronise) we break down all the things that made us feel good about ourselves, all the things that have happened to create the wonderful country that we have.
We change our laws to accommodate unreasonable behaviour from others
We allow others to be racist but not our own race.
We change our language (no more chairmen, just "chairs")
We remove words like "terror" from our language
We ban foxhunting yet we allow others to kill animals in inhumane ways for personal pleasure.
We play down our history.
We denigrate our own religion and culture
We sneer at the rich whilst handing out free money to feckless chavs
We have rich pop stars who make everyone else give money to Africa when they themselves have millions that they would not dream of giving away.
We have the same pop stars courted by politicians and given knighthoods without any care or concern as to what happens to the money that we give.
We pour scorn on the richest country in the world
and we sneer cynically on Israel.
The reason that these immigrants come here? it is because they want to be part of our society and enjoy Britain for what it is. They do not want to hear this patronising self loathing bulltulip. They want to feel that they are part of a strong confident and proud nation. If the liberals didnt spend their lives undoing alll the things that makde the UK "Great" (and no spod I have not just returned from the pub) then the mosques would have Union Jacks flying out of them (as the stars and stripes do in mosques in the USA)
Comment