Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
It's Vista with new bells and whistles. Vista is fine, now it's been out for a while, the drivers have caught up, and modern PCs are powerful enough to cope with it. But the name "Vista" has a bad reputation so they're re-releasing it with a different splash screen and some GUI changes to distance it from what was before. But it's still Vista underneath I'm sure.
XP had lots of compatibilty issues and accusations of being a resource hog when it first came out too.
So it could probably go on a machine that runs XP?
I have a pretty meaty laptop and vista runs like a bloody dog on it.
No 1st-hand experience but some people said it is significantly faster (including startup time) than XP. I heard one of the key aims is for this OS to work on notebooks and mini-PCs - real low-spec machines.
I'm wondering if I should replace my Windows Server 2008 install on my laptop. That seems to run faster than Vista and has been rock solid from the start.
Comment