• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

too early for April Fools - Ryanair to charge for toilets....

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    too early for April Fools - Ryanair to charge for toilets....

    Cross your legs: Ryanair to implement fee per wee

    RONAN MCGREEVY

    Sat, Jan 16, 2010

    AIRLINE CHARGES: RYANAIR says it will press ahead with plans to charge passengers to use its aircraft’s toilets. Despite admitting its announcement last year that it might install coin-operated facilities was a publicity stunt, chief executive Michael O’Leary is now revisiting the issue, according to the airline.

    Ryanair would also like to remove the two toilets at the back of each aircraft, leaving only one on board and creating room for six extra seats.

    In its in-flight magazine the airline described the coin-operated toilets as a “cost saving proposal” that would help reduce fares by at least 5 per cent.

    Ryanair spokesman Stephen McNamara said the €1/£1 charge would apply only to flights of an hour or less, which would include almost all Ryanair routes between Ireland and Britain.

    McNamara added that Ryanair was in talks with Boeing about refitting 50 of its 737- series aircraft with a single coin-operated toilet. There was no health-and-safety issue, he said, although the change would need approval, as Ryanair’s fleet is already fitted with its maximum permissible number of seats. “One toilet will discourage overdependence. There is nothing in the rule book to say that an aircraft has to have any toilets at all, which might sound strange, but we believe three toilets are excessive.”

    One industry expert cast doubt on the proposals. Ryanair could install coin-operated locks on its toilet doors fairly simply, he said, but replacing two of each aircraft’s three toilets with seats would be very expensive. Boeing “would have to embark on a huge type-certification exercise” to prove that the remodelled aircraft could still be evacuated within two minutes, and, combined with the complexities of re-engineering each 737, the cost could amount to “between €250,000 and €500,000” per plane.

    Such changes are not unknown. Airbus agreed to install extra seats on its A319 aircraft for a large order from easyJet, making the emergency exits larger in order to comply with safety regulations. But Ryanair’s changes “could make its aircraft hard to sell on”, as relatively few airlines would be interested in buying single- toilet planes.

    O’Leary caused a furore when he announced the toilet proposal to the BBC, last February. The story ran for a week before he admitted at a tourism conference in Malahide that Boeing could not do it and “some bureaucrat in Brussels” had said it was impossible. “It is not likely to happen, but it makes for interesting and very cheap PR,” he said at the time.

    McNamara said his boss had a habit of thinking out loud when it came to cost-cutting proposals. “The funny thing about Michael is that he’ll say these things as an off-the-cuff remark, and then he’ll start to think about it more and more, and he’ll start doing the sums. He has said that if it got him €5 extra he’d wipe people’s bottoms for them.”

    © 2010 The Irish Times
    This default font is sooooooooooooo boring and so are short usernames

    #2
    This should help him to slash costs

    Comment


      #3
      What's the problem? Contractors charge when they go to the bog...

      Comment


        #4
        It's a tax on the poo

        Comment


          #5
          Money do not smell.

          HTH

          O’Leary

          Comment


            #6
            Originally posted by Churchill View Post
            What's the problem? Contractors charge when they go to the bog...
            In fact when you go clients pay extra to keep you there
            Let us not forget EU open doors immigration benefits IT contractors more than anyone

            Comment


              #7
              Originally posted by thunderlizard View Post
              It's a tax on the poo
              It's worse than taking the piss.
              My all-time favourite Dilbert cartoon, this is: BTW, a Dumpster is a brand of skip, I think.

              Comment


                #8
                Originally posted by DodgyAgent View Post
                In fact when you go clients pay extra to keep you there
                Ha ha ha bump!

                Comment


                  #9
                  An aircraft does not have to have toilets at all? I shall certainly stop flying if they implement that no leaving seats in last hour thing. Nothing makes me want a pee more than knowing I can't.
                  bloggoth

                  If everything isn't black and white, I say, 'Why the hell not?'
                  John Wayne (My guru, not to be confused with my beloved prophet Jeremy Clarkson)

                  Comment


                    #10
                    If they start charging for the toilets won't people be tempted to, erm, get their money's worth?
                    +50 Xeno Geek Points
                    Come back Toolpusher, scotspine, Voodooflux. Pogle
                    As for the rest of you - DILLIGAF

                    Purveyor of fine quality smut since 2005

                    CUK Olympic University Challenge Champions 2010/2012

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X