First post, read loads, go easy on me!
In a nutshell I'm a 14-year permie veteran and have been thinking about contracting for the last couple of years (having been surrounded by idiots on contracts earning way more than me making fools of themselves) but haven't been in a position to take the plunge due to 0 savings (so no warchest).
I'm now in a position where I *should* be getting redundancy which I'd be ecstatic about but can't believe how HR are dragging their heels.
I've TUPE'd twice so have some decent historic T's &C's, one being no "mobility clause" & second being decent (IMO) redundancy package. Biggest gripe I have is the pay is tulip and has been for some time.
I've had some internal "assignments" offered to me but they're based on working in London 5 days/wk (I'm midlands-based) and they offered me the equivalent of £50/wk "uplift" for this priviledge, oh, plus they wanted me to add the mobility clause to my contract :-O
So, I politely declined their offer and basically said I'll wait/look for a position "close to home" (which I know isn't going to materialise).
I'd "heard" from others that redundancy kicked in at my place if you spent 3 months on the bench (you're supposed to be put "at risk" after 4 weeks at least) but I can't find anything official on the company intranet.
As it happens, HR must seem to keep thinking I've fallen off the face of the planet as I'm now in week 13 on the internal bench, on full pay! It's been an enviable (if boring) position for sure but I've now been offered a serious contract on my doorstep (on a day-rate that's roughly treble my current gross).
So, my question is, should I show my cards & push harder for redundancy or will they think "if he's desperate enough for his next job he'll just leave anyway". Never having faced redundancy before I'm not really sure how it all works (and previous work was far from "office job" so no history to compare to).
Having skimmed through the redundancy rights on DirectGov it seems they're supposed to give me 3 months notice of redundancy as well (I've had nowt) so, as 3 months on contract is worth far more, is it worth me "throwing them a bone" & forgoing the notice period to save them 3 months salary (and risk of finding me another job close to home) or are such rights rigid?
Obviously I want to avoid walking away from a potentially decent redundancy payout!
Any views appreciated...
Paul
In a nutshell I'm a 14-year permie veteran and have been thinking about contracting for the last couple of years (having been surrounded by idiots on contracts earning way more than me making fools of themselves) but haven't been in a position to take the plunge due to 0 savings (so no warchest).
I'm now in a position where I *should* be getting redundancy which I'd be ecstatic about but can't believe how HR are dragging their heels.
I've TUPE'd twice so have some decent historic T's &C's, one being no "mobility clause" & second being decent (IMO) redundancy package. Biggest gripe I have is the pay is tulip and has been for some time.
I've had some internal "assignments" offered to me but they're based on working in London 5 days/wk (I'm midlands-based) and they offered me the equivalent of £50/wk "uplift" for this priviledge, oh, plus they wanted me to add the mobility clause to my contract :-O
So, I politely declined their offer and basically said I'll wait/look for a position "close to home" (which I know isn't going to materialise).
I'd "heard" from others that redundancy kicked in at my place if you spent 3 months on the bench (you're supposed to be put "at risk" after 4 weeks at least) but I can't find anything official on the company intranet.
As it happens, HR must seem to keep thinking I've fallen off the face of the planet as I'm now in week 13 on the internal bench, on full pay! It's been an enviable (if boring) position for sure but I've now been offered a serious contract on my doorstep (on a day-rate that's roughly treble my current gross).
So, my question is, should I show my cards & push harder for redundancy or will they think "if he's desperate enough for his next job he'll just leave anyway". Never having faced redundancy before I'm not really sure how it all works (and previous work was far from "office job" so no history to compare to).
Having skimmed through the redundancy rights on DirectGov it seems they're supposed to give me 3 months notice of redundancy as well (I've had nowt) so, as 3 months on contract is worth far more, is it worth me "throwing them a bone" & forgoing the notice period to save them 3 months salary (and risk of finding me another job close to home) or are such rights rigid?
Obviously I want to avoid walking away from a potentially decent redundancy payout!
Any views appreciated...
Paul
Comment