This is getting on my nerves now.
The other day we had a journalists wife suggesting that the foreign office should "get him out because he put his life at risk". Apologies if I sound unsympathetic but the reality is that mounting a mission into a besieged city without permission from the people shelling the place in order to rescue someone who chose to put his own life at risk is foolhardly and only likely to endanger more lives.
Now it seems some rather brave folks from the red crescent have attempted to rescue the French woman who was recently wounded and the above mentioned man and they have refused to go with them. Twice.
The other day we had a journalists wife suggesting that the foreign office should "get him out because he put his life at risk". Apologies if I sound unsympathetic but the reality is that mounting a mission into a besieged city without permission from the people shelling the place in order to rescue someone who chose to put his own life at risk is foolhardly and only likely to endanger more lives.
Now it seems some rather brave folks from the red crescent have attempted to rescue the French woman who was recently wounded and the above mentioned man and they have refused to go with them. Twice.
Comment