Surely we're overdue for a Global Warming thread?
You may have noticed that our house 'sceptics' EO, BB and DP and friends rely almost exclusively on media reports, opinion pieces, books, newspapers and other unreviewed secondary sources to make their case.
Which seems odd, given that the reality (or otherwise) of anthropogenic climate change is essentially a scientific question, and usually for such questions one turns to the reviewed academic literature. I wonder if this pie chart provides a clue ?
Just a personal view but I think this underlines that we need to stop treating the delayers/inactivists with any respect; they have no scientific basis or underpinnings whatsoever, yet they have delayed effective action by perhaps a decade; which may end up as the difference between a manageable <2C rise and a catastophic >4C increase in global temperatures, perhaps millions of avoidable deaths.
Enjoy your evening.
Source Guest | Why Climate Deniers Have No Scientific Credibility - In One Pie Chart
You may have noticed that our house 'sceptics' EO, BB and DP and friends rely almost exclusively on media reports, opinion pieces, books, newspapers and other unreviewed secondary sources to make their case.
Which seems odd, given that the reality (or otherwise) of anthropogenic climate change is essentially a scientific question, and usually for such questions one turns to the reviewed academic literature. I wonder if this pie chart provides a clue ?
Just a personal view but I think this underlines that we need to stop treating the delayers/inactivists with any respect; they have no scientific basis or underpinnings whatsoever, yet they have delayed effective action by perhaps a decade; which may end up as the difference between a manageable <2C rise and a catastophic >4C increase in global temperatures, perhaps millions of avoidable deaths.
Enjoy your evening.
Source Guest | Why Climate Deniers Have No Scientific Credibility - In One Pie Chart
Comment